Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » Analyzing the interrelations among investors’ behavioral biases using an integrated DANP method

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

DSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (110)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (37)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Decision Science Letters
ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 13 Issue 1 pp. 119-134, 2024

Analyzing the interrelations among investors’ behavioral biases using an integrated DANP method Pages 119-134 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Nasser Safaie, Amir Sadighi, Majid Mirzaee Ghazani

📋 Author Affiliations:
doi 10.5267/j.dsl.2023.11.003
Crossref Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Behavioral biases, DANP method, SEM, Financial markets, Multi-Criteria Decision Making

Abstract: This research investigates the relationships between investors’ behavioral biases and compares their relative importance. For this purpose, a survey is conducted, and analytical methods are used. The sample for this study has been 512 individual investors of the Tehran Stock Exchange who completed an online questionnaire. The respondents replied about their behavior in different situations to analyze the prevalence of asymmetric discounting, mental accounting, shifting risk preference, loss aversion, regret aversion, overconfidence, proxy decision making, ambiguity aversion bias, anchoring, and herd behavior as significant fields of behavioral biases in their investment decisions. The data is analyzed using two different analytical techniques. A model based on structural equations is designed and tested to analyze the relations between these fields. Another integrated method, the DEMATEL-based analytic network process, is also used to prioritize and rank these behavioral biases. Finally, the results are compared and confirmed by each other. Analyzing the results proves the existence of 19 positive and statistically significant relations between these fields. Thus, an increase or decrease in the intensity of a particular field of behavioral biases in one’s decisions significantly affects the intensity of other fields. The present study finds that shifting risk preference, anchoring, loss aversion, and regret aversion are the most important fields of behavioral biases based on their prevalence among investors and their correlations with other biases.


How to cite this paper
APA: Safaie, N., Sadighi, A & Ghazani, M. (2024). Analyzing the interrelations among investors’ behavioral biases using an integrated DANP method. Decision Science Letters, 13(1), 119-134.
Chicago/Turabian: Safaie, N., Sadighi, A & Ghazani, M. 2024. "Analyzing the interrelations among investors’ behavioral biases using an integrated DANP method." Decision Science Letters 13, no. 1 (2024): 119-134.
AMA: Safaie, N., Sadighi, A & Ghazani, M. Analyzing the interrelations among investors’ behavioral biases using an integrated DANP method. Decision Science Letters. 2024;13(1):119-134.

References
Adem, A. M., & Sarıoğlu, S. E. (2020). Analysis of investors herding behaviour: an empirical study from Istanbul stock exchange. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(2).
Ahmed, Z., Rasool, S., Saleem, Q., Khan, M. A., & Kanwal, S. (2022). Mediating role of risk perception between behavioral biases and investor’s investment decisions. Sage Open, 12(2), 21582440221097394.
Alshalabi, L. (2020). The effect of investors behavioral biases on the trading volume in G7 and BRICS stock markets (Master's thesis, Finans Enstitüsü).
Appelt, K. C., Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2011). Asymmetric discounting of gains and losses: A query theory account. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 43, 107-126.
Aren, S., Aydemir, S. D., & Şehitoğlu, Y. (2016). Behavioral biases on institutional investors: a literature review. Kybernetes, 45(10), 1668-1684.
Ateş, S., Coşkun, A., Şahin, M. A., & Demircan, M. L. (2016). Impact of Financial Literacy on the Behavioral Biases of Individual Stock Investors: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Business & Economics Research Journal, 7(3).
Awwad, J. (2017). The impact of behavioral biases on the Palestinian investors: portfolio investment decisions and anomalies emergence (Doctoral dissertation).
Bahrami, L., Safaie, N., & Hamidi, H. (2021). Effect of motivation, opportunity and ability on human resources information security management considering the roles of attitudinal, behavioral and organizational factors. International Journal of Engineering, 34(12), 2624-2635.
Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. H. (2002). A Survey of Behavioral Finance. NBER Working Paper, (w9222).
Bashir, T., Azam, N., Butt, A. A., Javed, A., & Tanvir, A. (2013). Are behavioral biases influenced by demographic characteristics & personality traits? Evidence from Pakistan. European Scientific Journal, 9(29).
Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. (2014). Ebook: Essentials of investments: Global edition. McGraw Hill.
Chiu, W. Y., Tzeng, G. H., & Li, H. L. (2013). A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business. Knowledge-based systems, 37, 48-61.
Dalgıç, N., Ekinci, C., & Ersan, O. (2021). Daily and intraday herding within different types of investors in Borsa Istanbul. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(6), 1793-1810.
Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461.
Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. The quarterly journal of economics, 75(4), 643-669.
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
Gazel, S. (2015). The regret aversion as an investor bias. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 4(02), 419-424.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook (p. 197). Springer Nature.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99-127).
Kartini, K., & NAHDA, K. (2021). Behavioral biases on investment decision: A case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 1231-1240.
Kumar, S., & Goyal, N. (2016). Evidence on rationality and behavioural biases in investment decision making. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 8(4), 270-287.
Lu, M. T., Lin, S. W., & Tzeng, G. H. (2013). Improving RFID adoption in Taiwan's healthcare industry based on a DEMATEL technique with a hybrid MCDM model. Decision support systems, 56, 259-269.
Lux, T. (1995). Herd behaviour, bubbles and crashes. The economic journal, 105(431), 881-896.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological methods, 1(2), 130.
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological bulletin, 97(3), 562.
Pakdel, A., Izadiniya, N., & Dastgir, M. (2018). Identifying the Effect Factors of Mental Accounting for Portfolio Constructing by Innovative Investors Via Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Accounting and Auditing Research, 10(40), 127-146.
Pompian, M. M. (2012). Behavioral finance and wealth management: how to build investment strategies that account for investor biases (Vol. 667). John Wiley & Sons.
Kishor, N. (2022). Development and validation of behavioral biases scale: a SEM approach. Review of Behavioral Finance, 14(2), 237-259.
Sabir, S. A., Mohammad, H. B., & Shahar, H. B. K. (2019). The role of overconfidence and past investment experience in herding behaviour with a moderating effect of financial literacy: evidence from Pakistan stock exchange. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 9(4), 480.
Safaie, N., Sadighi, A., & Mirzaei, M. The Impact of Behavioral Biases in Financial Markets and the Role of Personal Characteristics: A Case Study of Tehran Stock Exchange.
Setayesh, M. H., Momtazian, A., & Rajabdoory, H. (2017). Investigating the relationship between religious attitude and perceptual errors in stock exchange investors. International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting, 2(5), 39-50.
Tehrani, R., & Gharehkoolchian, N. (2012). Factors affecting the disposition effect in Tehran stock market. International Business Research, 5(3), 40.
Tekçe, B., & Yılmaz, N. (2015). Are individual stock investors overconfident? Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 5, 35-45.
Tekçe, B., Yılmaz, N., & Bildik, R. (2016). What factors affect behavioral biases? Evidence from Turkish individual stock investors. Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 515-526.
Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral decision making, 12(3), 183-206.
Torabi, A., Hamidi, H., & Safaie, N. (2021). Effect of sensory experience on customer word-of-mouth intention, considering the roles of customer emotions, satisfaction, and loyalty. International Journal of Engineering, 34(3), 682-699.
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Decision Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2024 | 📖 Volume: 13 | 📄 Issue: 1 | 👁️ Views: 1826 | 📊 Crossref:

Related Articles:
  • The biased factors of investor’s behavior in stock exchange trading
  • Impact of herding behavior and overconfidence bias on investors’ decision-making in Pakistan
  • An investigation on the effect of investor’s behavior on fund management
  • The effects of uncertainty of available information on investors' behaviors on herding formation
  • A study on investors’ personality characteristics and behavioral biases: Conservatism bias and availability bias in the Tehran Stock Exchange

📝 Ready to share your research?

Decision Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com