Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » Applying fuzzy delphi and best-worst method for identifying and prioritizing key factors affecting on university-industry collaboration

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (96)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

DSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
    • Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • Volume 15 (19)
      • Issue 1 (19)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(111)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Financial performance(83)
Sustainability(82)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Artificial intelligence(77)
Knowledge Management(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2184)
Indonesia(1290)
India(788)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Decision Science Letters

ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 9 Issue 1 pp. 107-118 , 2020

Applying fuzzy delphi and best-worst method for identifying and prioritizing key factors affecting on university-industry collaboration Pages 107-118 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Alireza Mosayebi, Shahryar Ghorbani, Behzad Masoomi

DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2019.7.001

Keywords: University- Industry collaboration, Technology, Incubator, University affiliated research institutes

Abstract: The collaboration between the universities and industries is currently in the focus of attention globally. Governments, universities, and industries are interested in good and effective collaboration, which would be beneficial for all parties. To foster University-Industry Collaboration, and to help transfer the knowledge and technology between these two parties, academics, politicians and companies are paying attention to science and technology policies more than ever. In this study, the factors affecting the improvement of University-Industry Collaboration are identified and prioritized. In the first step, 20 factors are identified and 12 factors are selected using the Fuzzy Delphi method. Then, using the BWM method, prioritizing the extracted factors is determined for industry sponsorship of the university research. Finally, based on the results, the discussion is conducted and six major strategies are presented to improve this relationship.

How to cite this paper
Mosayebi, A., Ghorbani, S & Masoomi, B. (2020). Applying fuzzy delphi and best-worst method for identifying and prioritizing key factors affecting on university-industry collaboration.Decision Science Letters , 9(1), 107-118.

Refrences
Agrawal, A. K. (2001). University‐to‐industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(4), 285-302.
Amabile, T. M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J., Wojcik, T., Odomirok, P. W., Marsh, M., & Kramer, S. J. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 418-431.
Baba, Y., Shichijo, N., & Sedita, S. R. (2009). How do collaborations with universities affect firms’ innovative performance? The role of “Pasteur scientists” in the advanced materials field. Research Policy, 38(5), 756-764.
Bäck, I., & Kohtamäki, M. (2015). Boundaries of R&D collaboration. Technovation, 45, 15-28.
Barnes, T., Pashby, I., & Gibbons, A. (2002). Effective university–industry interaction:: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative r&d projects. European Management Journal, 20(3), 272-285.
Bedwell, W. L., Wildman, J. L., DiazGranados, D., Salazar, M., Kramer, W. S., & Salas, E. (2012). Collaboration at work: An integrative multilevel conceptualization. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 128-145.
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69-89.
Brockliss, L. (2000). Gown and town: The university and the city in Europe, 1200–2000. Minerva, 38(2), 147-170.
Charles, D. (2003). Universities and territorial development: reshaping the regional role of UK universities. Local Economy, 18(1), 7-20.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467.
D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?. Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313.
Duru, O., Bulut, E., & Yoshida, S. (2012). A fuzzy extended DELPHI method for adjustment of statistical time series prediction: An empirical study on dry bulk freight market case. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 840-848.
Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 20(2), 18-29.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330.
Eun, J. H., Lee, K., & Wu, G. (2006). Explaining the “University-run enterprises” in China: A theoretical framework for university–industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Research Policy, 35(9), 1329-1346.
Franklin, S. J., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 127-141.
Giuliani, E., & Arza, V. (2009). What drives the formation of ‘valuable’university–industry linkages?: Insights from the wine industry. Research policy, 38(6), 906-921..
Iqbal, A. M., Khan, A. S., Iqbal, S., & Senin, A. A. (2011). Designing of success criteria-based evaluation model for assessing the research collaboration between university and industry. International Journal of Business Research and Management, 2(2), 59-73.
Kardaras, D. K., Karakostas, B., & Mamakou, X. J. (2013). Content presentation personalisation and media adaptation in tourism web sites using Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(6), 2331-2342.
Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1988). Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science. Elsevier Science Inc.
Langford, C. H., Hall, J., Josty, P., Matos, S., & Jacobson, A. (2006). Indicators and outcomes of Canadian university research: Proxies becoming goals?. Research policy, 35(10), 1586-1598.
Lundberg, J., Tomson, G., Lundkvist, I., Sk? r, J., & Brommels, M. (2006). Collaboration uncovered: Exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics, 69(3), 575-589.
Luoma, P., Raivio, T., Tommila, P., Lunabba, J., Halme, K., Viljamaa, K., & Lahtinen, H. (2011). Better results, more value. A framework for Analysing the societal impact of Research and Innovation. Tekes review, 288, 2011.
Ma, Z., Shao, C., Ma, S., & Ye, Z. (2011). Constructing road safety performance indicators using fuzzy delphi method and grey delphi method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1509-1514.
Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university–industry–government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research policy, 39(5), 640-649.
Perkmann, M., Neely, A., & Walsh, K. (2011). How should firms evaluate success in university–industry alliances? A performance measurement system. R&D Management, 41(2), 202-216.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., ... & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research policy, 42(2), 423-442.
Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39(5), 602-612.
Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57.
Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126-130.
Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(1), 1-35.
Santoro, M. D. (2000). Success breeds success: The linkage between relationship intensity and tangible outcomes in industry–university collaborative ventures. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(2), 255-273.
Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactions. Research Policy, 31(7), 1163-1180.
Seppo, M., & Lilles, A. (2012). Indicators measuring university-industry cooperation. Journal of Instrumentation, 204-225.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27-48.
Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2016). How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1250-1259.
Tijssen, R. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Van Wijk, E. (2009). Benchmarking university-industry research cooperation worldwide: performance measurements and indicators based on co-authorship data for the world's largest universities. Research Evaluation, 18(1), 13-24.
Tsasis, P. (2009). The social processes of interorganizational collaboration and conflict in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(1), 5-21.
Tuunainen, J., & Knuuttila, T. (2009). Intermingling academic and business activities: A new direction for science and universities?. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 34(6), 684-704.
Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor's perspective. In: Katz, J.A. (Ed.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
Villani, E., Rasmussen, E., & Grimaldi, R. (2017). How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 86-102.
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147-175.
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Decision Science Letters | Year: 2020 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 1 | Views: 2014 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Investigation and evaluation of key success factors in technological innova ...
  • An ISM approach for analyzing the factors in technology transfer
  • Empirical analysis of university-industry R & D collaboration: Evidence fro ...
  • Canonical correlation analysis between collaborative networks and innovatio ...
  • Developing a novel approach for modeling the social effects of technology t ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com