Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » An American option contract toward supply chain coordination

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

DSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (110)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (37)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Decision Science Letters
ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 7 Issue 4 pp. 503-522, 2018

An American option contract toward supply chain coordination Pages 503-522 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Masoud Rabbani, Neda Manavizadeh, Hamed Vafa Arani, Safoura Famil Alamdar

📋 Author Affiliations:
M. Rabbani ORCID 1, N. Manavizadeh ORCID 2, H.V. Arani1, S.F. Alamdar1
1 School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Khatam University, Tehran, Iran
doi 10.5267/j.dsl.2017.12.001
2 Source: Scopus
Crossref 2 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Supply chain coordination, American option mechanism, Wholesale mechanism, Stochastic programming, Geometric Brownian Motion

Abstract: Coordination improves the profit of all the members in a supply chain. In this paper, a novel coordination mechanism is introduced in a retailer-manufacturer supply chain in which the retailer can adopt either an American option mechanism or a wholesale mechanism to satisfy the market demand throughout a multi-period horizon. The manufacturer follows a make-to-order production policy. This mechanism gives the retailer the right to select the more beneficial mechanism in each period. The retailer as the leader of the chain decides how many options should be purchased at the beginning of the horizon through a mixed-integer mathematical model. This model addresses the uncertainties in the market demand and the market price, simultaneously. A scenario planning approach is used to treat the random variables within the model. Also, an optimal scenario reduction model is adapted to reduce the computational complexity of the problem. Finally, a numerical experiment is designed to validate the performance of the model. The results demonstrate a remarkable improvement in the profit of both members. Moreover, a number of experiments are performed to show how the option price, the exercise price and the interest rate affect the performance of the contract.

How to cite this paper
APA: Rabbani, M., Manavizadeh, N., Arani, H & Alamdar, S. (2018). An American option contract toward supply chain coordination. Decision Science Letters, 7(4), 503-522.
Chicago/Turabian: Rabbani, M., Manavizadeh, N., Arani, H & Alamdar, S. 2018. "An American option contract toward supply chain coordination." Decision Science Letters 7, no. 4 (2018): 503-522.
AMA: Rabbani, M., Manavizadeh, N., Arani, H & Alamdar, S. An American option contract toward supply chain coordination. Decision Science Letters. 2018;7(4):503-522.

References
Arani, H. V., Rabbani, M., & Rafiei, H. (2016). A revenue-sharing option contract toward coordination of supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 178, 42-56.
Babich, V. (2006). Vulnerable options in supply chains: Effects of supplier competition. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 53(7), 656-673.
Bresnahan, T. F., & Reiss, P. C. (1985). Dealer and manufacturer margins. The RAND Journal of Economics, 253-268.
Burnetas, A., & Ritchken, P. (2005). Option pricing with downward-sloping demand curves: The case of supply chain options. Management Science, 51(4), 566-580.
Buzacott, J., Yan, H., & Zhang, H. (2011). Risk analysis of commitment–option contracts with forecast updates. IIE Transactions, 43(6), 415-431.
Cai, J., Zhong, M., Shang, J., & Huang, W. (2017). Coordinating VMI supply chain under yield uncertainty: Option contract, subsidy contract, and replenishment tactic. International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 196-210.
Chen, X., Hao, G., & Li, L. (2014). Channel coordination with a loss-averse retailer and option contracts. International Journal of Production Economics, 150, 52-57.
Chen, X., & Shen, Z. J. (2012). An analysis of a supply chain with options contracts and service requirements. IIE Transactions, 44(10), 805-819.
Chen, X., Wan, N., & Wang, X. (2017). Flexibility and coordination in a supply chain with bidirectional option contracts and service requirement. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 183-192.
Cheng, F., Ettl, M., Lin, G. Y., Schwarz, M., & Yao, D. D. (2003). Flexible supply contracts via options. IBM TJ Watson Research Center Working Paper.
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2007). Supply chain management. Strategy, planning & operation. Das summa summarum des management, 265-275.
Dupačová, J., Gröwe-Kuska, N., & Römisch, W. (2003). Scenario reduction in stochastic programming. Mathematical programming, 95(3), 493-511.
Gan, X., Sethi, S. P., & Yan, H. (2005). Channel coordination with a risk‐neutral supplier and a downside‐risk‐averse retailer. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 80-89.
Gomez_Padilla, A., & Mishina, T. (2009). Supply contract with options. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 312-318.
Gröwe-Kuska, N., Heitsch, H., & Romisch, W. (2003, June). Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction for power management problems. In Power tech conference proceedings, 2003 IEEE Bologna (Vol. 3, pp. 7-pp). IEEE.
Hasani, R., Jafarzadeh, H., & Khoshalhan, F. (2013). A new method for supply chain coordination with credit option contract and customers’ backordered demand. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 1(4), 207-218.
Heitsch, H., & Römisch, W. (2003). Scenario reduction algorithms in stochastic programming. Computational optimization and applications, 24(2-3), 187-206.
Huang, M. G. (2009). Real options approach-based demand forecasting method for a range of products with highly volatile and correlated demand. European journal of operational research, 198(3), 867-877.
Hull, J. C., & Basu, S. (2016). Options, futures, and other derivatives. Pearson Education India.
Jörnsten, K., Nonås, S. L., Sandal, L., & Ubøe, J. (2013). Mixed contracts for the newsvendor problem with real options and discrete demand. Omega, 41(5), 809-819.
Kanda, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2008). Supply chain coordination: perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. International journal of production Economics, 115(2), 316-335.
Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management science, 43(4), 546-558.
Li, H., Ritchken, P., & Wang, Y. (2009). Option and forward contracting with asymmetric information: Valuation issues in supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 134-148.
Li, Z., & Floudas, C. A. (2014). Optimal scenario reduction framework based on distance of uncertainty distribution and output performance: I. Single reduction via mixed integer linear optimization. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 70, 50-66.
Liu, C., Jiang, Z., Liu, L., & Geng, N. (2013). Solutions for flexible container leasing contracts with options under capacity and order constraints. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(1), 403-413.
Luo, M., Li, G., Wan, C. J., Qu, R., & Ji, P. (2015). Supply chain coordination with dual procurement sources via real-option contract. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 80, 274-283.
Niknam, T., Azizipanah-Abarghooee, R., & Narimani, M. R. (2012). An efficient scenario-based stochastic programming framework for multi-objective optimal micro-grid operation. Applied Energy, 99, 455-470.
Nomikos, N. K., Kyriakou, I., Papapostolou, N. C., & Pouliasis, P. K. (2013). Freight options: Price modelling and empirical analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 51, 82-94.
Tsay, A. A. (1999). The quantity flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Management science, 45(10), 1339-1358.
Wang, X., & Liu, L. (2007). Coordination in a retailer-led supply chain through option contract. International Journal of Production Economics, 110(1), 115-127.
Wang, Y. (2010). Scenario reduction heuristics for a rolling stochastic programming simulation of bulk energy flows with uncertain fuel costs. Iowa State University.
Watkins, D. W., McKinney, D. C., Lasdon, L. S., Nielsen, S. S., & Martin, Q. W. (2000). A scenario‐based stochastic programming model for water supplies from the highland lakes. International Transactions in Operational Research, 7(3), 211-230.
Xia, Y., Ramachandran, K., & Gurnani, H. (2011). Sharing demand and supply risk in a supply chain. IIE Transactions, 43(6), 451-469.
Xu, H. (2010). Managing production and procurement through option contracts in supply chains with random yield. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 306-313.
Yang, L., Tang, R., & Chen, K. (2017). Call, put and bidirectional option contracts in agricultural supply chains with sales effort. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 47, 1-16.
Zhao, Y., Ma, L., Xie, G., & Cheng, T. E. (2013). Coordination of supply chains with bidirectional option contracts. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(2), 375-381.
Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Cheng, T. E., Yang, X., & Huang, Z. (2010). Coordination of supply chains by option contracts: A cooperative game theory approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 668-675.
Zhang, R. Q., & Wang, R. P. (2009). Scenario-based stochastic capacity planning model and decision risk analysis. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 29(1), 55-63.

  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Decision Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2018 | 📖 Volume: 7 | 📄 Issue: 4 | 👁️ Views: 2734 | 📊 Crossref: 2

Related Articles:
  • Supply chain coordination via a two-part tariff contract with price and sales effort dependent demand
  • Game-theoretic analysis of supply chain coordination under advertising and price dependent demand
  • Coordination of a three-level supply chain under disruption using profit sharing and return policy contracts
  • A new method for supply chain coordination with credit option contract and customers’ backordered demand
  • Supply chain coordination under retail competition and advertising dependent demand

📝 Ready to share your research?

Decision Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com