Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » A novel approach for risk evaluation and risk response planning in a geothermal drilling project using DEMATEL and fuzzy ANP

Journals

  • IJIEC (726)
  • MSL (2637)
  • DSL (649)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (26)
  • SCI (26)

DSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
    • Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(108)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(85)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(81)
TOPSIS(80)
Job satisfaction(80)
Sustainability(79)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(76)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(61)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Sautma Ronni Basana(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2179)
Indonesia(1285)
Jordan(786)
India(785)
Vietnam(502)
Saudi Arabia(448)
Malaysia(439)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(184)
Thailand(151)
United States(110)
Ukraine(104)
Turkey(103)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Pakistan(85)
Peru(85)
Morocco(79)
United Kingdom(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Decision Science Letters

ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 7 Issue 3 pp. 225-242 , 2018

A novel approach for risk evaluation and risk response planning in a geothermal drilling project using DEMATEL and fuzzy ANP Pages 225-242 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Alireza Ghassemi, Ayoub Darvishpour

DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2017.10.001

Keywords: Risk response planning, Risk evaluation, Project risk management, Geothermal drilling project, Fuzzy MCDM

Abstract: Risk response planning is a widely concerned issue. Project managers usually struggle to control different kinds of risks. In project risk management, after evaluating risks, the final process relates to choosing desirable responses to the risks. In this paper, a comprehensive framework confronts the issue in three main phases. In the first phase, all the risks, responses and their relations in a geothermal drilling project are detected. These relations imply there are inner dependent and outer dependent relations. In the second phase, ANP, DEMATEL and fuzzy theory play important roles in weighting risks and responses. In the third phase, to enable a more realistic solution, a zero-one integer programming reflects a budget constraint and other required constraints. After obtaining the optimal responses, the effect of budget is analyzed. In addition, the influences of risks on each other are discussed more deeply. Collectively, this study offers a new perspective on how to handle project risks and choose their responses

How to cite this paper
Ghassemi, A & Darvishpour, A. (2018). A novel approach for risk evaluation and risk response planning in a geothermal drilling project using DEMATEL and fuzzy ANP.Decision Science Letters , 7(3), 225-242.

Refrences
Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Williams, T., & Howick, S. (2007). Systemic risk assessment: a case study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(1), 39-51.
Ben-David, I., Rabinowitz, G., & Raz, T. (2002). Economic optimization of project risk management efforts. The Israel Institute of Business Research.
Büyüközkan, G., & Öztürkcan, D. (2010). An integrated analytic approach for Six Sigma project selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8), 5835-5847.
Calabrese, A., Costa, R., & Menichini, T. (2013). Using Fuzzy AHP to manage Intellectual Capital assets: An application to the ICT service industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(9), 3747-3755.
Chang, C. W., Wu, C. R., Lin, C. T., & Lin, H. L. (2007). Evaluating digital video recorder systems using analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes. Information Sciences, 177(16), 3383-3396.
Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European journal of operational research, 95(3), 649-655.
Chapman, C. B. (1979). Large engineering project risk analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, (3), 78-86.
Deng, H. (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. International journal of approximate reasoning, 21(3), 215-231.
Dey, P. K. (2002). Project risk management: a combined analytic hierarchy process and decision tree approach. Cost Engineering, 44(3), 13-27.
Durán, C., Sepulveda, J., & Carrasco, R. (2018). Determination of technological risk influences in a port system using DEMATEL. Decision Science Letters, 7(1), 1-12.
Ebrahimnejad, S., Mousavi, S., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Heydar, M. (2012). Evaluating high risks in large-scale projects using an extended VIKOR method under a fuzzy environment. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 3(3), 463-476.
Fan, M., Lin, N. P., & Sheu, C. (2008). Choosing a project risk-handling strategy: An analytical model. International Journal of Production Economics, 112(2), 700-713.
Fang, C., Marle, F., Xie, M., & Zio, E. (2013). An integrated framework for risk response planning under resource constraints in large engineering projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(3), 627-639.
Gonen, A. (2011, December). Optimal risk response plan of project risk management. In Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2011 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 969-973). IEEE.
Gonen, A. (2012). Selecting a Response Plan Under Budget Constraints. In Risk Management-Current Issues and Challenges. InTech.
Kayis, B., Arndt, G., Zhou, M., & Amornsawadwatana, S. (2007). A risk mitigation methodology for new product and process design in concurrent engineering projects. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 56(1), 167-170.
Klein, J. H. (1993). Modelling risk trade-off. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44(5), 445-460.
Klein, J. H., Powell, P. L., & Chapman, C. B. (1994). Project risk analysis based on prototype activities. Journal of the Operational Research society, 45(7), 749-757.
Kuchta, D., & Skorupka, D. (2014). Choice of countermeasures in project risk management using fuzzy modelling. International Journal Of Computers Communications & Control, 9(5), 584-592.
Kujawski, E. (2002). Selection of technical risk responses for efficient contingencies. Systems Engineering, 5(3), 194-212.
Kwan, T. W., & Leung, H. K. (2011). A risk management methodology for project risk dependencies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 37(5), 635-648.
Kwan, T. W., & Leung, H. K. (2011). A risk management methodology for project risk dependencies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 37(5), 635-648.
Hashim Motaleb, O., & Kishk, M. (2014). Assessing risk response maturity: A framework for construction projects success in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7(2), 247-262.
Mousavi, S. M., Raissi, S., Vahdani, B., & Hossein, S. M. (2011). A fuzzy decision-making methodology for risk response planning in large-scale projects. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 57-70.
Nagar, B., & Raj, T. (2012). Risk mitigation in the implementation of AMTs: A guiding framework for future. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 3(3), 485-498.
Rose, K. H. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)—Fifth Edition. Project management journal, 44(3).
Ben-David, I., & Raz, T. (2001). An integrated approach for risk response development in project planning. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52(1), 14-25.
Nik, E. R., Zegordi, S. H., & Nazari, A. (2011, December). A multi-objective optimization and fuzzy prioritization approach for project risk responses selection. In Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2011 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 888-892). IEEE.
Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process (Vol. 4922). Pittsburgh: RWS publications.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26.
THOMAS, L., & Vargas, L. G. (2013). Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process.
Sadjadi, S., & Sadi-Nezhad, S. (2017). Ranking Canadian oil and gas projects using TOPSIS. Journal of Project Management, 2(3), 87-92.
Samadi, H., Nazari-Shirkouhi, S., & Keramati, A. (2014). Identifying and analyzing risks and responses for risk management in information technology outsourcing projects under fuzzy environment. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 13(06), 1283-1323.
Seyedhoseini, S. M., Noori, S., & Hatefi, M. A. (2009). An integrated methodology for assessment and selection of the project risk response actions. Risk analysis, 29(5), 752-763.
Shariati, S. (2014). Underground mine risk assessment by using FMEA in the presence of uncertainty. Decision Science Letters, 3(3), 295-304.
Dizaji, M., Mazdeh, M., & Makui, A. (2018). Performance evaluation and ranking of direct sales stores using BSC approach and fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making methods. Decision Science Letters, 7(2), 197-210.
Soofifard, R., & Bafruei, M. K. (2017). An optimal model for Project Risk Response Portfolio Selection (P2RPS).
Wang, Y. M., & Elhag, T. M. (2007). A fuzzy group decision making approach for bridge risk assessment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53(1), 137-148.
Wang, Y. M., & Elhag, T. M. (2006). On the normalization of interval and fuzzy weights. Fuzzy sets and systems, 157(18), 2456-2471.
Ward, S., & Chapman, C. (2003). Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International journal of project management, 21(2), 97-105.
Wu, H. H., & Tsai, Y. N. (2011). A DEMATEL method to evaluate the causal relations among the criteria in auto spare parts industry. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(5), 2334-2342.
Yang, Y. P. O., Shieh, H. M., Leu, J. D., & Tzeng, G. H. (2008). A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International journal of operations research, 5(3), 160-168.
Zhang, Y. (2016). Selecting risk response strategies considering project risk interdependence. International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), 819-830.
Zhang, Y., & Fan, Z. P. (2014). An optimization method for selecting project risk response strategies. International Journal of Project Management, 32(3), 412-422.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Decision Science Letters | Year: 2018 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3 | Views: 2141 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • Risk management in industrial projects using structural equation modeling
  • An empirical investigation on ranking financial risk factors using AHP meth ...
  • Risks identification and ranking using AHP and group decision making techni ...
  • An empirical study for ranking risk factors using linear assignment: A case ...
  • Evaluating high risks in large-scale projects using an extended VIKOR metho ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2025 GrowingScience.Com