Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » Determination of technological risk influences in a port system using DEMATEL

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2653)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (49)
  • SCI (50)

DSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (73)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (32)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(84)
Financial performance(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Decision Science Letters
ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 7 Issue 1 pp. 1-12, 2018

Determination of technological risk influences in a port system using DEMATEL Pages 1-12 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Claudia Durán, Juan Sepulveda, Raúl Carrasco

📋 Author Affiliations:
C. Durán1, J. Sepulveda ORCID 1, R. Carrasco ORCID 2
1 Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile
2 Facultad de Administración y Economía, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile, Facultad de Ingeniería, Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Bernardo O'Higgins, Santiago, Chile
doi 10.5267/j.dsl.2017.5.002
13 Source: Scopus
Crossref 7 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Technological risk, Synergy of system, DEMATEL, Strategic planning, Process of information

Abstract: There is a little research about the relationship between risk and technology by using the DEMATEL model in a complex systems such as maritime port. Those studies neither include nor identify the relationships of technological risk generated between a Port Community and all the other actors who interact with it. This study presents the potential advantage of applying the DEMATEL to identify the synergic relationships at strategic and business levels produced by technological risk. The results determine the causes and the effects of decisions made by managers of port engineering community. They also affect the processes of information and communication logistics chains’ export and import.

How to cite this paper
APA: Durán, C., Sepulveda, J & Carrasco, R. (2018). Determination of technological risk influences in a port system using DEMATEL. Decision Science Letters, 7(1), 1-12.
Chicago/Turabian: Durán, C., Sepulveda, J & Carrasco, R. 2018. "Determination of technological risk influences in a port system using DEMATEL." Decision Science Letters 7, no. 1 (2018): 1-12.
AMA: Durán, C., Sepulveda, J & Carrasco, R. Determination of technological risk influences in a port system using DEMATEL. Decision Science Letters. 2018;7(1):1-12.

References
Bank, W. (2008). Developing countries must improve capacity to absorb and use technology. International Financing.
Bayaga, A., & Flowerday, S. (2012). Principal Causes of Information Communication Technology (ICT) Risk Failure in an SME. In 2012 International Conference on Cyber Security (pp. 152–156). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberSecurity.2012.26
Chien, K.-F., Wu, Z.-H., & Huang, S.-C. (2014). Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for BIM projects: Empirical study. Automation in Construction, 45, 1–15.
Chiu, Y.-J., Chen, H.-C., Tzeng, G.-H., & Shyu, J. Z. (2006). Marketing strategy based on customer behaviour for the LCD-TV. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 7(2–3), 143–165.
Corning, P. (2003). Nature’s Magic: Synergy in Evolution and the Fate of Humankind. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71, 653–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2003.12.001
Durán, C., & Córdova, F. (2015). Synergy and Technology Gaps in Export Logistics Chains between a Chilean and a Spanish medium-sized Port. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 632–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.055
Durán, C., & Córdova, F. (2016). Analysis of synergic relationship in a Chilean medium-sized port: An approach from the simulation of the transformation matrix of eigenvalues. In Computers Communications and Control (ICCCC), 2016 6th International Conference on (pp. 196–200). IEEE.
Espinosa, F., & Salinas, G. (2013). Selección de Estrategias de Mejoramiento de las Condiciones de Trabajo para la Función Mantenimiento Utilizando la Metodología MCDA Constructivista. Información Tecnológica, 24(3), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642013000300008
Falatoonitoosi, E., Leman, Z., Sorooshian, S., & Salimi, M. (2013). Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(13), 3476–3480.
Govindan, K., & Chaudhuri, A. (2016). Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 90, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.11.010
Hemati, M., Danaei, A., & Shahhosseini, M. (2012). An empirical study to measure the relative efficiency and strategic planning using BSC-DEA and DEMATEL. Management Science Letters, 2(4), 1109–1122.
Hu, H.-Y., Chiu, S.-I., Cheng, C.-C., & Yen, T.-M. (2011). Applying the IPA and DEMATEL models to improve the order-winner criteria: A case study of Taiwan’s network communication equipment manufacturing industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9674–9683.
Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2001). The strategy-focused organization : how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business School Press.
Katsigeras, C. (2011). Iliana Christodoulou-Varotsi: Maritime safety law and policies of the European Union and the United States of America: antagonism or synergy? Aegean Review of the Law of the Sea and Maritime Law, 1(2), 313–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12180-011-0022-x
Knowles, S. (2014). Engineering Risk and Disaster: Disaster-STS and the American History of Technology. Engineering Studies, 6(3), 227–248.
Lin, Y.-T., Yang, Y.-H., Kang, J.-S., & Yu, H.-C. (2011). Using DEMATEL method to explore the core competences and causal effect of the IC design service company: An empirical case study. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6262–6268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.092
Malina, M. A., Nørreklit, H. S. O., & Selto, F. H. (2007). Relations among measures, climate of control, and performance measurement models. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(3), 935–982.
Moghaddam, N. B., Sahafzadeh, M., Alavijeh, A. S., Yousefdehi, H., & Hosseini, S. H. (2011). Strategic Environment Analysis Using DEMATEL Method Through Systematic Approach. Management Science and Engineering, 4(4), 95–105.
Orman, L. V. (2013). Technology as risk. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 32(2), 22–31.
Piggin, R. S. H. (2014). Governance, risk and compliance: impediments and opportunities for managing operational technology risk in industrial cyber security and safety. In System Safety and Cyber Security (2014), 9th IET International Conference on (pp. 1–8). IET.
Poveda-Bautista, R., Baptista, D. C., & García-Melón, M. (2012). Setting competitiveness indicators using BSC and ANP. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4738–4752.
Renn, O., & Benighaus, C. (2013). Perception of technological risk: insights from research and lessons for risk communication and management. Journal of Risk Research, 16(3–4), 293–313.
Rodríguez, A., Ortega, F., & Concepción, R. (2017). An intuitionistic method for the selection of a risk management approach to information technology projects. Information Sciences, 375, 202–218.
Scheer, D. (2013). Risk governance and emerging technologies: learning from case study integration. Journal of Risk Research, 16(3–4), 355–368.
Stankiewicz, P. (2009). The role of risks and uncertainties in technological conflicts: Three strategies of constructing ignorance. Innovation–The European Journal of Social Science Research, 22(1), 105–124.
Sumrit, D., & Anuntavoranich, P. (2013). Using DEMATEL method to analyze the causal relations on technological innovation capability evaluation factors in thai technology-based firms. nternational Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies 4(2), 81–103.
Todt, O., & Luján, J. L. (2008). A new social contract for technology?–On the policy dynamics of uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research, 11(4), 509–523.
Wang, W.-C., Lin, Y.-H., Lin, C.-L., Chung, C.-H., & Lee, M.-T. (2012). DEMATEL-based model to improve the performance in a matrix organization. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 4978–4986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.10.016
Wei, H. (2010). Cooperation and Competition of Interfirm Network Organizations: The Function of Synergies. In 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (pp. 2339–2342). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEE.2010.591
Wu, H.-H., Shieh, J.-I., Li, Y., & Chen, H.-K. (2010). A combination of AHP and DEMATEL in evaluating the criteria of employment service outreach program personnel. Information Technology Journal, 9(3), 569–575.
Wu, H.-Y. (2012). Constructing a strategy map for banking institutions with key performance indicators of the balanced scorecard. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(3), 303–320.
Wu, W.-W., & Lee, Y.-T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499–507.
Young, C. S. (2016). Information Technology Risk Measurements and Metrics BT. In Information Security Science, Measuring the Vulnerability to Data Compromises (pp. 263–285). Syngress. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809643-7.00012-7
Zhong, M., Wu, Y., & Luan, W. (2011). Model of synergy degree between port logistics and urban economy. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 37(1), 80–82.
  • 68
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Decision Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2018 | 📖 Volume: 7 | 📄 Issue: 1 | 👁️ Views: 2257 | 📊 Crossref: 7

Related Articles:
  • Extended TOPSIS model for solving multi-attribute decision making problems in engineering
  • An IF-DEMATEL-AHP based on Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers (TIFNs)
  • Strategic planning and performance measurement using Fuzzy DEMATEL: A case study of Iran Kaolin and Barite company
  • A study on important factors influencing on the effectiveness of futures research, training and employment
  • A new approach to analyze strategy map using an integrated BSC and FUZZY DEMATEL

📝 Ready to share your research?

Decision Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com