Abstract: Developing innovation, based on knowledge and technology, as a driving force of the economy, is necessary for survival and is required in having strong interactions within the globalized world of business. Innovation and technology development require an intertwined network of organizational interactions between public and private sector. The activities and interactions of these firms are the reasons for innovation development in the framework of innovation systems. Following strategies is of crucial necessity and importance in industries such as aerospace and remotely-piloted helicopters (RPH) with their complex characteristics, costly and time-consuming processes. Understanding the business environment and identifying the success factors is a significant step towards adopting innovative strategies and planning for technology development. The aim of this article is to evaluate the key success factors in technological innovation development of remotely-piloted helicopters (RPH) industry. The methodology used in this article is Best-Worst method which is considered as one of the most prominent and effective MCDM methods. Based on a case study and by reviewing the extant and relevant literature, the key success factors of technological innovation development of remotely-piloted helicopters (RPH) industry in Iran were identified. Then by applying the “Best-Worst” method and the experts’ opinions, the key success factors were analyzed and prioritized. Finally, some suggestions are made by considering the results of the study.
How to cite this paper
Ghaffari, S., Arab, A., Nafari, J & Manteghi, M. (2017). Investigation and evaluation of key success factors in technological innovation development based on BWM.Decision Science Letters , 6(3), 295-306.
Afuah, A. (2003). Innovation management: strategies, implementation and profits. Oxford University Press, USA. Anadon, L. D., Chan, G., Harley, A. G., Matus, K., Moon, S., Murthy, S. L., & Clark, W. C. (2016). Making technological innovation work for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(35), 9682-9690. Belassi, W., & Tukel, O.I. (1996). A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in project. International Journal of Project Management, 14(3), 141–51. Bergek, A. (2002). Shaping and exploiting technological opportunities: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research policy, 37(3), 407-429. Birchall, D. W., Chanaron, J. J., & Soderquist, K. (1996). Managing innovation in SMEs: a comparison of companies in the UK, France and Portugal. International Journal of Technology Management, 12(3), 291-305. Calantone, R. J., Schmidt, J. B., & Song, X. M. (1996). Controllable factors of new product success: A cross-national comparison. Marketing Science, 15(4), 341-358. Chang, Y. C. (2012). How do established firms improve radical innovation performance? The organizational capabilities view. Technovation, 32(7), 441-451. Cooper, R. G. (1979). Identifying industrial new product success: Project NewProd. Industrial Marketing Management, 8(2), 124-135. Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2007). Winning businesses in product development: The critical success factors. Research-Technology Management, 50(3), 52-66. Drucker, P. (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge. Furman, J. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation mManagement, 19(2), 110-132. Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413-432. Hesselbein, F., Goldsmith, M., & Somerville, I. (2002). Leading for innovation and organizing for results. Jossey-Bass. Johnson, A. (2001, June). Functions in innovation system approaches. In Nelson and Winter Conference, Aalborg, Denmark (pp. 12-15). Khalil, T. M. (2000). Management of technology: The key to competitiveness and wealth creation. McGraw-Hill Science, Engineering & Mathematics. Korea Technology and Information Promotion Agency for SMEs (2006). A Reaserch on the innovation promoting policy for SMEs in APEC:survey and case studies, Seoul: Korea Technology and Information Promotion Agency for SMEs. LeBlanc, L. J., Nash, R., Gallagher, D., Gonda, K., & Kakizaki, F. (1997). A comparison of US and Japanese technology management and innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 13(5-6), 601-614. Parry, M. E., & Song, X. M. (1994). Identifying new product successes in China. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(1), 15-30. Petersen, D. J., & Malone, R. L. (1975). The personnel effectiveness grid (PEG): A new tool for estimating personnel department effectiveness. Human Resource Management (pre-1986), 14(4), 10. Pinto, J.K., & Covin J.G. (1989). Critical factors in project implementation a comparison of construction and R&D projects. Technovation, 9, 49-62. Porter, M. (2000). Competition and economic development: local clusters in global economy. Economic Development, 14. Raven, R., Van den Bosch, S., & Weterings, R. (2010). Transitions and strategic niche management: towards a competence kit for practitioners. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 57-74. Rezaei, J. (2015a). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57. Rezaei, J. (2015b). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126-130. Rezaei, J., Hemmes, A., & Tavasszy, L. (2016a). Multi-criteria decision-making for complex bundling configurations in surface transportation of air freight. Journal of Air Transport Management. Rezaei, J., Nispeling, T., Sarkis, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2016b). A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 577-588. Rezaei, J., Wang, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2015). Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9152-9164. Ritter, T., (2003). The impact of a company’s business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success. Journal of Business Research, 57(5), 548–556. Schilling, W. (1967). Recovery of the electrical resistivity of pure metals after short irradation with Neutrons inside a reactor. Zeitschrift-fuer-Angewandte-Physik, 22(6), 452-60. Slater, S. F., & Mohr, J. J. (2006). Successful development and commercialization of technological innovation: insights based on strategy type. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 26-33. Smits, R., & Kuhlmann, S. (2004). The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1-2), 4-32. Van Mierlo, B., Leeuwis, C., Smits, R., & Woolthuis, R. K. (2010). Learning towards system innovation: Evaluating a systemic instrument. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(2), 318-334. Voß, J. P., Smith, A., & Grin, J. (2009). Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management. Policy sciences, 42(4), 275-302. Warren, M. (2004). A Study of Innovation:Anatomy of the Key Success Factors. Henley: Henley MBA dissertation,USA. Wirawan, C. (2012). Open Innovation Implementation to Sustain Indonesian SMEs. Procedia Economics and Finance, 4(2), 223–233. Xin, P.U., Jizhen, L.I., Zhu. H. (2004). cross-national study of success factors in innovation project: China and western developed countries. Research Center for Technological Innovation & School of Economics and Management.