Abstract: Nowadays efficiency measurement is considered as one of the most important methods for performance assessment of the organizations. Assessment of academic education and research system is a vital factor for education and research promotion and also is a panoramic mirror for education and research activities. The aim of this research is to assess the efficiency measurement of Shiraz university colleges over the period 2009 – 2014. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as one of the most important methods of efficiency measurement has two limitations: First, it calculates cross-sectional efficiency values and second, it may consider many units as an efficient unit. Window Data Envelopment Analysis (WDEA) is used for eliminating the first limitation and similarly double frontier analysis is used to overcome the second limitation. The results show that proposed WDEA method with double frontier in comparison with traditional analysis, provides more accurate results.
How to cite this paper
Sharifian, S., Ebrahimi, A & Alimohammadlou, M. (2017). An application of window data envelopment analysis methodology with double frontier in the performance assessment of Shiraz university colleges.Decision Science Letters , 6(3), 269-282.
Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2003). The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education review, 22(1), 89-97. García-Aracil, A., & Palomares-Montero, D. (2008, September). Evaluation of Spanish universities: Efficiency, technology and productivity change. In Prime-Latin America Conference at Mexico City, September. Ahn, T., & Seiford, L. M. (1993). Sensitivity of DEA to models and variable sets in a hypothesis test setting: The efficiency of university operations. Creative and innovative approaches to the science of management, 191-208. Alam Tabriz, A., Deylami Moezi, S., & Saiedy, H.(2010). Using an integrated approach DEA and AHP to evaluate the Efficiency Evaluation Faculties of University, Journal of Management Studies, 89, 25-36. [Persian]. Alam Tabriz, A., Faraji, R., & Saiedy, H. (2010). Efficiency Evaluation Faculties of Shahid Beheshti University using Composed Approach of DEA and Goal Programming Model. Industrial Management Studies, 8(19), 1-22. [Persian]. Amani, B., & Arabzadeh, S. M. (2014). Performance evaluation of data service units, window coverings case study analysis approach SAIPA Isfahan province, Industrial Engineering Research Conference. [Persian]. Afonso, A., & Santos, M. (2008). A DEA approach to the relative efficiency of Portuguese public universities. Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, 13(1), 67-87. Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57-80. Balabonienė, I., & Večerskienė, G. (2014). The peculiarities of performance measurement in universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 605-611. Bessent, A. M., Bessent, E. W., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Thorogood, N. C. (1983). Evaluation of educational program proposals by means of DEA. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19(2), 82-107. Charles, V., & Zegarra, L. F. (2014). Measuring regional competitiveness through data envelopment analysis: A peruvian case. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(11), 5371-5381. Cullinane, K., Song, D. W., Ji, P., & Wang, T. F. (2004). An application of DEA windows analysis to container port production efficiency. Review of network Economics, 3(2). Emami Meibodi, A. (2006). Efficiency and productivity measurement (in theory and practice). [Persian] Fallahi, M.A., & Ahmadi, V. (2005). Cost Efficiency Analysis of Electricity Distribution Companies in Iran, Journal of Economic Researches, 71, 297-320. Førsund, F. R., & Kalhagen, K. O. (1999). Efficiency and productivity of Norwegian Colleges. In Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector (pp. 269-308). Deutscher Universitätsverlag. Flegg, A. T., Allen, D. O., Field, K., & Thurlow, T. W. (2003). Measuring the efficiency and productivity of British universities: an application of DEA and the Malmquist approach. University of the West of England, Department of Economics, series Discussion Papers, 304. Gökşen, Y., Doğan, O., & Özkarabacak, B. (2015). A Data Envelopment Analysis Application for Measuring Efficiency of University Departments. Procedia Economics and Finance, 19, 226-237. Heydari Nejad, S., & Mozafari, AA. (2006). Evaluation of efficiency phisical educations faculties and departments by DEA Olympic J, Vol. 14(2), 7-17. [Persian]. Hsieh, L. F., & Lin, L. H. (2010). A performance evaluation model for international tourist hotels in Taiwan—An application of the relational network DEA. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(1), 14-24. Johnes, J. (2008). Efficiency and productivity change in the English higher education sector from 1996/97 to 2004/5. The Manchester School, 76(6), 653-674. Kao, C. (2016). Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. Katharaki, M., & Katharakis, G. (2010). A comparative assessment of Greek universities’ efficiency using quantitative analysis. International journal of educational research, 49(4), 115-128. Kiakojoori, D., Aghajani, H., Roudgarnezhad, F., Alipour, H., & Kojoori, K. K. (2011). Performance Appraisal of Islamic Azad University Branches of Mazandaran Provinceusing data envelopment analysis. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5, 840-848. Kutlar, A., Kabasakal, A., & Babacan, A. (2015). Dynamic Efficiency of Turkish Banks: a DEA Window and Malmquist Index Analysis for the Period of 2003-2012. Sosyoekonomi, 23(24). Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. (2013). A survey of DEA applications. Omega, 41(5), 893-902. Martín, E. (2006). Efficiency and Quality in the Current Higher Education Context in Europe: an application of the data envelopment analysis methodology to performance assessment of departments within the University of Zaragoza. Quality in higher education, 12(1), 57-79. Mohammadi, A., Mohammadi, K., & Jahanbani, M. (2012) Improve Measurement Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis, Using Data Envelopment Analysis Gray, Iran Management Research, 17, 152-135. Mousakhani, M., Vadoodimofid, B., & Hamidi, N.(2005). Developing a model for efficiency and productivity growth in higher education centers. Quarterly Science Journal of Management, 3(6), 45-53. [Persian]. El-Razik, E. A. (2015). Data Envelopment Analysis a Technique for Measuring Efficiency. British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 5(6), 763. Safdari Ranjbar, M., Khalili, M., Azami, A., & Sabzekar, A. (2010). Evaluate the performance of universities and colleges from the perspective of knowledge production using data envelopment analysis (Case study: Amirkabir University), Journal of Operation Research in its Aplication, 2(37), 61-76. [Persian]. Sameti, M., & Rezvani, M. A. (2002). Efficiencyof Majnr Universities in Iran (using DEA Method), Journal of Economic Research, 59(2), 117-147. [Persian]. Seol, H., Lee, S., & Kim, C. (2011). Identifying new business areas using patent information: A DEA and text mining approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 2933-2941. Sharei, Z. (2010). Evaluate and compare performance using DEA in PNU South Khorasan province, according to the Centers Grant Scheme PNU, third National Conference DEA, Islamic Azad University of Boroujerd. [Persian]. Sherman, H. D., & Ladino, G. (1995). Managing bank productivity using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Interfaces, 25(2), 60-73. Shoja, N., Falah Jelodar, M., & Darvish Motavali, M. H. (2010). Determine the efficiency of District 12 Islamic Azad University using multi-component model in DEA, Journal of Operation Research in its Aplication, 2(29), 11-28. [Persian]. Sidorenko, T., & Gorbatova, T. (2015). Efficiency of Russian Education Through the Scale of World University Rankings. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 464-467. Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A., & Barboy, A. (1994). Academic departments efficiency via DEA. Computers & Operations Research, 21(5), 543-556. Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2011). A combined use of DEA (data envelopment analysis) with strong complementary slackness condition and DEA–DA (discriminant analysis). Applied Mathematics Letters, 24(7), 1051-1056. Thanassoulis, E., Kortelainen, M., & Allen, R. (2012). Improving envelopment in data envelopment analysis under variable returns to scale. European journal of operational research, 218(1), 175-185. Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research policy, 31(1), 109-124. Wang, K., Yu, S., & Zhang, W. (2013). China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5), 1117-1127. Wang, Y. M., & Chin, K. S. (2009). A new approach for the selection of advanced manufacturing technologies: DEA with double frontiers. International Journal of Production Research, 47(23), 6663-6679. Wang, Y. M., & Lan, Y. X. (2013). Estimating most productive scale size with double frontiers data envelopment analysis. Economic Modelling, 33, 182-186. Yang, H. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2009). Using DEA window analysis to measure efficiencies of Taiwan's integrated telecommunication firms. Telecommunications Policy, 33(1), 98-108. Zhao, Y., Triantis, K., Murray-Tuite, P., & Edara, P. (2011). Performance measurement of a transportation network with a downtown space reservation system: A network-DEA approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 1140-1159.