Abstract: he VIKOR (Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje which means multi-criteria optimization and compromise solution, in Serbian) method has already become a quite popular multi-criteria decision making tool for its computational simplicity and solution accuracy. This method focuses on selecting and ranking from a set of feasible alternatives, and determines compromise solution for a problem with conflicting criteria to help the decision maker in reaching a final course of action. It determines the compromise ranking list based on the particular measure of closeness to the ideal solution. Depending upon the type of decision problem and necessity of the decision maker, apart from VIKOR method, different variants of it, like comprehensive VIKOR, fuzzy VIKOR, regret theory-based VIKOR, modified VIKOR and interval VIKOR methods have also been subsequently developed. In this paper, the ranking performance of original VIKOR method and its five variants is analyzed based on two demonstrative examples. It is observed that interval VIKOR method performs unsatisfactorily and when the information in a decision problem is imprecise, fuzzy VIKOR method should always be preferred. But, for any decision problem, original VIKOR is the best method for solution without unnecessarily complicating the related mathematical computations.
How to cite this paper
Chatterjee, P & Chakraborty, S. (2016). A comparative analysis of VIKOR method and its variants.Decision Science Letters , 2016(5), 469-486.
Anojkumar, L., Ilangkumaran, M., & Sasirekha, V. (2014). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(6), 2964-2980. Bahraminasab, M., & Jahan, A. (2011). Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR. Materials and Design, 32(8-9), 4471-4477. Bell, D.E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961-981. Cavallini, C., Giorgetti, A., Citti, P., & Nicolaie, F. (2013). Integral aided method for material selection based on quality function deployment and comprehensive VIKOR algorithm. Materials and Design, 47, 27-34. Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M., & Chakraborty, S. (2009). Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Materials and Design, 30(10), 4043-4053. Delgado, M., Vila, M.A., & Voxman, W. (1998). On a canonical representation of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 94(1), 205-216. Huang, J-J., Tzeng, G-H., & Liu, H-H. (2009). A revised VIKOR model for multiple criteria decision making - The perspective of regret theory. In: MCDM 2009, Shi, Y. et al. (Eds.), 761-768. Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Ismail, M.Y., Sapuan, S.M., & Bahraminasab, M. (2011). A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Materials and Design, 32(3), 1215-1221. Jahanshahloo, G.R., Lotfi, F.H. & Davoodi, A.R. (2009). Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: Interval efficiency. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49(5-6), 1137-1142. Jeya Girubha, R., & Vinodh, S. (2012). Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component. Materials and Design, 37, 478-486. Kuo, M-S., & Liang, G-S. (2011). Combining VIKOR with GRA techniques to evaluate service quality of airports under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1304-1312. Liou, J.J.H., Tsai, C-Y., Lin, R-H., & Tzeng, G-H. (2011). A modiﬁed VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17(2), 57-61. Maity, S.R., & Chakraborty, S, (2013). Grinding wheel abrasive material selection using fuzzy TOPSIS method. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 28(4), 408-417. Maji, L. (2012). A note on “A modiﬁed VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality”. Journal of Air Transport Management, 20, 7-8. Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Govindan, K., Senin, A.A., & Jusoh, A., (2016). VIKOR technique: A systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications. Sustainability, 8, 1-38. Mellers, B.A. (2000). Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 910-924. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455. Opricovic, S. (2011). Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12983-12990. Rao, R.V. (2007). Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods. Springer-Verlag, London. San Cristóbal, J.R. (2011). Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The Vikor method. Renewable Energy, 36(2), 498-502. Sayadi, M.K., Heydari, M., & Shahanaghi, K. (2009). Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(5), 2257-2262. Sengupta, A., & Pal, T.K. (2000). On comparing interval numbers. European Journal of Operational Research, 127(1), 28-43. Sun, S. (2002). Assessing computer numerical control machines using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 40(9), 2011-2039. Vahdani, B., Mousavi, S.M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2011). Group decision making based on novel fuzzy modified TOPSIS method. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(9), 4257-4269. Velasquez, M., & Hester, P.T. (2013). An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56-66. Yazdani, M., & Graeml, F.R. (2014). VIKOR and its applications: A state-of-the-art survey. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences, 5(2), 56-83. Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York.