Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » Application of the ROV method for the selection of cutting fluids

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2653)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (49)
  • SCI (50)

DSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (73)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (32)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Decision Science Letters
ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 5 Issue 2 pp. 245-254, 2016

Application of the ROV method for the selection of cutting fluids Pages 245-254 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Miloš Madić, Miroslav Radovanović, Manić Manić

📋 Author Affiliations:
M. Madić ORCID , M. Radovanović ORCID , M. Manić
¹ University of Niš, A. Medvedeva 14, Niš, Serbia
doi 10.5267/j.dsl.2015.12.001
33 Source: Scopus
Crossref 38 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Cutting fluid, Multi-criteria decision making, Range of value

Abstract: Production engineers are frequently faced with the multi-criteria selection problems in the manufacturing environment. Over the years, many multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods have been proposed to help decision makers in solving different complex selection problems. This paper introduces the use of an almost unexplored MCDM method, i.e. range of value (ROV) method for solving cutting fluid selection problems. The main motivation of using the ROV method is that it offers a very simple computational procedure compared to other MCDM methods. Applicability and effectiveness of the ROV method have been demonstrated while solving four case studies dealing with selection of the most suitable cutting fluid for the given machining application. In each case study the obtained complete rankings were compared with those derived by the past researchers using different MCDM methods. The results obtained using the ROV method have excellent correlation with those derived by the past researchers which validate the usefulness and effectiveness of this simple MCDM method for solving cutting fluid selection problems.

How to cite this paper
APA: Madić, M., Radovanović, M & Manić, M. (2016). Application of the ROV method for the selection of cutting fluids. Decision Science Letters, 5(2), 245-254.
Chicago/Turabian: Madić, M., Radovanović, M & Manić, M. 2016. "Application of the ROV method for the selection of cutting fluids." Decision Science Letters 5, no. 2 (2016): 245-254.
AMA: Madić, M., Radovanović, M & Manić, M. Application of the ROV method for the selection of cutting fluids. Decision Science Letters. 2016;5(2):245-254.

References
Abhang, L. B., & Hameedullah, M. (2012). Selection of lubricant using combined multiple attribute decision making method. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 7(1), 39-50.

Athawale, V. M., & Chakraborty, S. (2011). A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection. International journal of industrial engineering computations, 2(4), 831-850.

Cak?r, O., Yardimeden, A., Ozben, T., & Kilickap, E. (2007). Selection of cutting fluids in machining processes. Journal of Achievements in materials and Manufacturing engineering, 25(2), 99-102.

Chakraborty, S., & Chatterjee, P. (2013). Selection of materials using multi-criteria decision-making methods with minimum data. Decision Science Letters, 2(3), 135-148.

Chakraborty, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making. Informatica, 25(1), 1-20.

Deshamukhya, T., & Ray, A. (2014). Selection of cutting fluid for green manufacturing using analytical hierarchy process (AHP): a case study. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, 3, 174–182.

Hajkowicz, S., & Higgins, A. (2008). A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European journal of operational research, 184(1), 255-265.

Jagadish, A., & Ray, A. (2014). Green cutting fluid selection using MOOSRA method. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 3(3), 559–563.

Klocke, F., & Eisenbl?tter, G. (1997). Dry cutting. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 46(2), 519–526.

Radovanovi?, M. (2002). Technology of Machinery. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ni?.

Rao, R. V. (2004). Performance evaluation of cutting fluids for green manufacturing using a combined multiple attribute decision making method.International Journal of Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing, 12(2), 526-535.

Rao, R. V. (2007). Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment: Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods. Springer.

Rao, R. V., & Gandhi, O. P. (2002). Digraph and matrix methods for the machinability evaluation of work materials. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42(3), 321-330.

Venkata Rao, R., & Patel, B. K. (2010). Decision making in the manufacturing environment using an improved PROMETHEE method.International Journal of Production Research, 48(16), 4665-4682.

Singh, T., Gupta, M., & Sharma, M. A. (2015). Stock market liquidity and firm performance. Accounting, 1(1), 29-36.

Sun, J., Ge, P., & Liu, Z. (2001). Two-grade fuzzy synthetic decision-making system with use of an analytic hierarchy process for performance evaluation of grinding fluids. Tribology international, 34(10), 683-688.

Tan, X. C., Liu, F., Cao, H. J., & Zhang, H. (2002). A decision-making framework model of cutting fluid selection for green manufacturing and a case study. Journal of Materials processing technology, 129(1), 467-470.

Taniki?, D., Mani?, M., Deved?i?, G., & Stevi?, Z. (2010). Modelling metal cutting parameters using intelligent techniques. Strojni?ki vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 56(1), 52-62.

Tiwari, V.V., & Sharma, A. (2015). MADM for selection of vegetable based cutting fluids by SAW method and WPM method. International Journal of Research in Technology and Management, 1, 16–28.

Yakowitz, D. S., Lane, L. J., & Szidarovszky, F. (1993). Multi-attribute decision making: dominance with respect to an importance order of the attributes. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 54(2), 167-181.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Decision Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2016 | 📖 Volume: 5 | 📄 Issue: 2 | 👁️ Views: 2737 | 📊 Crossref: 38

Related Articles:
  • Evaluation and selection of energy technologies using an integrated graph theory and analytic hierarchy process methods
  • Selection of industrial robots using the Polygons area method
  • Selection of materials using multi-criteria decision-making methods with minimum data
  • A note on “An alternative multiple attribute decision making methodology for solving optimal facility layout design selection problems”
  • A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection

📝 Ready to share your research?

Decision Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com