Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » Surface roughness prediction of particulate composites using artificial neural networks in turning operation

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

DSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (110)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (37)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Decision Science Letters
ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 4 Issue 3 pp. 419-424, 2015

Surface roughness prediction of particulate composites using artificial neural networks in turning operation Pages 419-424 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Mohammad Ramezani

📋 Author Affiliations:
M.R. Mohammad ORCID 1
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
doi 10.5267/j.dsl.2015.3.001
4 Source: Scopus
Crossref 3 Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Composites (PAMCs), Reinforced Aluminum Matrix, Surface Roughness Particulate, Turning

Abstract: A number of factors, e.g. cutting speed and feed rate, affect the surface roughness in machining process. In this paper, an Artificial Neural Network model was used to forecast surface roughness with related inputs, including cutting speed and feed rate. The output of the ANN model input parameters related to the machined surface roughness parameters. In this research, twelve samples of experimental data were used to train the network. Moreover, four other experimental tests were implemented to test the network. The study concludes that ANN was a reliable and accurate method for predicting machining parameters in CNC turning operation of Particulate Reinforced Aluminum Matrix Composites (PAMCs) specimens with 0%, 5%, 10% and 15% filler. The aim of this work is to decrease the production cost and consequently increase the production rate of these materials for industry without any trial and error method procedure.

How to cite this paper
APA: Ramezani, M. (2015). Surface roughness prediction of particulate composites using artificial neural networks in turning operation. Decision Science Letters, 4(3), 419-424.
Chicago/Turabian: Ramezani, M. 2015. "Surface roughness prediction of particulate composites using artificial neural networks in turning operation." Decision Science Letters 4, no. 3 (2015): 419-424.
AMA: Ramezani, M. Surface roughness prediction of particulate composites using artificial neural networks in turning operation. Decision Science Letters. 2015;4(3):419-424.

References
Aleksander, I., & Morton, H. (1995). An introduction to neural computing. London: International Thomson Computer Press.

Childs, T. (2000). Metal machining: Theory and applications. London: Arnold.

Davalo, E., & Nai?m, P. (1991). Neural networks. London: Macmillan.

Demuth, H., & Beale, M. (2000). Matlab Neural Network Toolbox User & apos; s Guide.

Ezugwu, E. O., Arthur, S. J., & Hines, E. L. (1995). Tool-wear prediction using artificial neural networks. Journal of materials Processing technology, 49(3), 255-264.

Groover, M. P. (2002). Solutions manual: fundamentals of modern manufacturing. Wiley.

Jafarian, F., Taghipour, M., & Amirabadi, H. (2013). Application of artificial neural network and optimization algorithms for optimizing surface roughness, tool life and cutting forces in turning operation. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 27(5), 1469-1477.

?zel, T., Karpat, Y., Figueira, L., & Davim, J. P. (2007). Modelling of surface finish and tool flank wear in turning of AISI D2 steel with ceramic wiper inserts. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 189(1), 192-198.

Ramezani, M., & Afsari, A., (2015). Surface roughness and cutting force estimation in the CNC turning using artificial neural networks. Management Science Letters. Vol. 5, Issue 4. 357-362.

Rao, C. P., & Bhagyashekar, M. S. (2014). Effect of machining parameters on the surface roughness while turning particulate composites. Procedia Engineering, 97, 421-431.

Reddy, V. D., Krishnaiah, G. A., Kumar, H., & Priya, S. K. (Dec., 2011). ANN Based Prediction of Surface Roughness in Turning, International Conference on Trends in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (ICTMIE & apos; 2011) Bangkok

Sharma, V. S., Dhiman, S., Sehgal, R., & Sharma, S. K. (2008). Estimation of cutting forces and surface roughness for hard turning using neural networks. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19, 473-483.

Surappa, M. K. (2003). Aluminium matrix composites: Challenges and opportunities. Sadhana, 28(1-2), 319-334.

Pal, S. K., & Chakraborty, D. (2005). Surface roughness prediction in turning using artificial neural network. Neural Computing & Applications, 14(4), 319-324.

Zain, A. M., Haron, H., & Sharif, S. (2010). Prediction of surface roughness in the end milling machining using Artificial Neural Network. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1755-1768.

Zhong, Z. W., Khoo, L. P., & Han, S. T. (2006). Prediction of surface roughness of turned surfaces using neural networks. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28(7-8), 688-693.
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Decision Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2015 | 📖 Volume: 4 | 📄 Issue: 3 | 👁️ Views: 2045 | 📊 Crossref: 3

Related Articles:
  • Surface roughness and cutting force estimation in the CNC turning using artificial neural networks
  • Response surface and artificial neural network prediction model and optimization for surface roughness in machining
  • Application of Taguchi and regression analysis on surface roughness in machining hardened AISI D2 steel
  • Optimization of multiple performance characteristics in turning using Taguchi’s quality loss function: An experimental investigation
  • Effect of machining conditions on MRR and surface roughness during CNC Turning of different Materials Using TiN Coated Cutting Tools – A Taguchi approach

📝 Ready to share your research?

Decision Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com