Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » An FMEA analysis using grey theory and grey rough sets

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (840)
  • IJDS (1032)
  • DSL (759)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (563)
  • JPM (350)
  • AC (572)
  • JFS (106)
  • MSL (2658)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (54)
  • SCI (53)

DSL Volumes

    • ▼ Volume 15 (110)
      • Issue 1 (19)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (32)
      • Issue 4 (37)
    • ▼ Volume 14 (87)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (18)
    • ▼ Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • ▼ Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • ▼ Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • ▼ Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • ▼ Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • ▼ Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • ▼ Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • ▼ Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • ▼ Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

🔑 Keywords

Jordan(175)
Supply chain management(172)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(117)
Supply chain(115)
Artificial intelligence(108)
Service quality(101)
Competitive advantage(100)
SMEs(95)
Sustainability(94)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
optimization(88)
Financial performance(86)
TOPSIS(85)
Trust(85)
Genetic Algorithm(81)
Organizational performance(81)
Job satisfaction(81)
Social media(80)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(70)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(65)
Endri Endri(45)
Hotlan Siagian(43)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Dmaithan Almajali(39)
Jumadil Saputra(37)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Sautma Ronni Basana(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(30)
Hassan Ghodrati(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Mahmoud Allahham(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (9)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Decision Science Letters
ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 2 Issue 4 pp. 299-304, 2013

An FMEA analysis using grey theory and grey rough sets Pages 299-304 PDF Download PDF

Authors: Farshad Faezy Razi, Abolfazl Danaei, Amir Ehsani, Changiz Dolati

📋 Author Affiliations:
Crossref Source: CrossRef

🔑 Keywords: FMEA, Grey Rough Sets, Grey Theory, Rough Set, RPN

Abstract: This paper presents a hybrid method for detecting the most important failure items as well as the most effective alternative strategy to cope with possible events. The proposed model of this paper uses grey technique to rank various alternatives and FMEA technique to find important faults. The implementation of the proposed method has been illustrated for an existing example on the literature. The results of this method show that the proposed model has been capable of detecting the most trouble making problems with fuzzy logic and finds the most important solution strategy using FMEA technique.

How to cite this paper
APA: Razi, F., Danaei, A., Ehsani, A & Dolati, C. (2013). An FMEA analysis using grey theory and grey rough sets. Decision Science Letters, 2(4), 299-304.
Chicago/Turabian: Razi, F., Danaei, A., Ehsani, A & Dolati, C. 2013. "An FMEA analysis using grey theory and grey rough sets." Decision Science Letters 2, no. 4 (2013): 299-304.
AMA: Razi, F., Danaei, A., Ehsani, A & Dolati, C. An FMEA analysis using grey theory and grey rough sets. Decision Science Letters. 2013;2(4):299-304.

References
Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2011). Evaluating supplier development programs with a grey based rough set methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 13505-13517.

Bevilacqua, M., Braglia, M., & Gabbrielli, R. (2000). Monte Carlo simulation approach for a modified FMECA in a power plant. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 16(4), 313-324.

Bowles, J. B., & Pel?ez, C. E. (1995). Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 50(2), 203-213.

Braglia, M. (2000). MAFMA: multi-attribute failure mode analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17(9), 1017-1033.

Braglia, M., Frosolini, M., & Montanari, R. (2003). Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 19(5), 425-443.

Chang, C. L., Wei, C. C., & Lee, Y. H. (1999). Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy method and grey theory. Kybernetes, 28(9), 1072-1080.

Hawkins, P.G., & Woollons, D. J. (1998). Failure modes and effects analysis of complex engineering systems using functional models. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 12(4), 375-397.

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making. Berlin: Springer.
James, E. B. (1998). Risk analysis: Two tools you can use to assure product safety and reliability.

Li, G. D., Yamaguchi, D., & Nagai, M. (2008). A grey-based rough decision-making approach to supplier selection. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36(9-10), 1032-1040.

Puente, J., Pino, R., Priore, P., & de la Fuente, D. (2002). A decision support system for applying failure mode and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(2), 137-150.

Rhee, S. J., & Ishii, K. (2003). Using cost based FMEA to enhance reliability and serviceability. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 17(3), 179-188.

Sankar, N. R., & Prabhu, B. S. (2001). Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(3), 324-336.

Scipioni, A., & Andreazza, D. (1997). Il sistema HACCP. Sicurezza e qualità nelle aziende agroalimentari. Hoepli Editore.

Wang, J., Ruxton, T., & Labrie, C. R. (1995). Design for safety of engineering systems with multiple failure state variables. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 50(3), 271-284.

Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1195-1207.

Yang, Z., Xu, B., Chen, F., Hao, Q., Zhu, X., & Jia, Y. (2010). A new failure mode and effects analysis model of CNC machine tool using fuzzy theory. In Information and Automation (ICIA), 2010 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 582-587). IEEE.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

📚 Journal: Decision Science Letters | 📅 Year: 2013 | 📖 Volume: 2 | 📄 Issue: 4 | 👁️ Views: 3256 | 📊 Crossref:

Related Articles:
  • Assessment of worker safety in a pharmaceutical industry using FMEA
  • Optimization of machining parameters of turning operations based on multi performance criteria
  • Markov approach to evaluate the availability simulation model for power generation system in a thermal power plant ,
  • RAM investigation of coal-fired thermal power plants: A case study
  • A survivability model for ejection of green compacts in powder metallurgy technology

📝 Ready to share your research?

Decision Science Letters is accepting new submissions for upcoming issues. Join our community of authors and publish your work with us.

✓ Open access
✓ Rigorous peer review
✓ Fast publication
📤 Submit Your Manuscript →

📖 Author Guidelines

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com