Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Decision Science Letters » Ranking industries using a hybrid of DEA-TOPSIS

Journals

  • IJIEC (697)
  • MSL (2637)
  • DSL (631)
  • CCL (482)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (398)
  • AC (547)
  • JPM (228)
  • IJDS (809)
  • JFS (81)

DSL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
    • Volume 2 (30)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 3 (53)
      • Issue 1 (15)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 4 (48)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (12)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • Volume 5 (39)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (9)
    • Volume 6 (30)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (9)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 7 (41)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 8 (38)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (10)
    • Volume 9 (39)
      • Issue 1 (8)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (8)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 11 (49)
      • Issue 1 (9)
      • Issue 2 (9)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (17)
    • Volume 12 (64)
      • Issue 1 (12)
      • Issue 2 (24)
      • Issue 3 (13)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 13 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (18)
      • Issue 3 (19)
      • Issue 4 (20)
    • Volume 14 (69)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (23)
      • Issue 3 (25)

Keywords

Supply chain management(158)
Jordan(154)
Vietnam(147)
Customer satisfaction(119)
Performance(112)
Supply chain(106)
Service quality(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Competitive advantage(92)
SMEs(85)
optimization(83)
Financial performance(81)
Job satisfaction(78)
Factor analysis(78)
Trust(78)
Knowledge Management(76)
Genetic Algorithm(75)
Sustainability(73)
Social media(73)
TOPSIS(73)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(53)
Endri Endri(44)
Muhammad Alshurideh(40)
Hotlan Siagian(36)
Jumadil Saputra(35)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Dmaithan Almajali(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Ahmad Makui(30)
Basrowi Basrowi(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(27)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)
Ali Harounabadi(26)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2155)
Indonesia(1217)
India(768)
Jordan(731)
Vietnam(494)
Malaysia(418)
Saudi Arabia(411)
United Arab Emirates(210)
China(151)
Thailand(149)
United States(103)
Turkey(98)
Ukraine(97)
Egypt(90)
Canada(83)
Pakistan(81)
Peru(75)
United Kingdom(73)
Nigeria(73)
Morocco(67)


» Show all countries

Decision Science Letters

ISSN 1929-5812 (Online) - ISSN 1929-5804 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 2 Issue 4 pp. 251-256 , 2013

Ranking industries using a hybrid of DEA-TOPSIS Pages 251-256 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Amir Mehdiabadi, Abolfazl Rohani, Shahram Amirabdollahiyan

Keywords: Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA, Ranking, TOPSIS

Abstract: Ranking industry normally helps find hot sectors and attract potential investors to invest in appropriate plans. Ranking various industries is also a multiple criteria decision making problem. In this paper, we present an empirical investigation to rank different industries using the art of data envelopment analysis (DEA). The inputs of our proposed DEA model include capital, employment and importance coefficient and outputs are exports, ecological effects and added value. In addition, exports, value added and environmental investment are used as outputs of DEA method. Since the results of DEA may consider more than one efficient unit, so we implement Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) technique to rank efficient units. In our case study, there were 15 different sectors from various industries and the implementation of DEA technique recommends 8 efficient units. The implementation of TOPSIS among these efficient units has suggested that Chemical industry could be considered as the most attracting industry for investment.

How to cite this paper
Mehdiabadi, A., Rohani, A & Amirabdollahiyan, S. (2013). Ranking industries using a hybrid of DEA-TOPSIS.Decision Science Letters , 2(4), 251-256.

Refrences
Charnes A, Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of the Operational Research, 2, 429–44.

Charnes A, Cooper W. W., Lewin, A., Seiford, L. M. (1994). Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology and applications. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Chang, C. H., Lin, J. J., Lin, J. H., & Chiang, M. C. (2010). Domestic open-end equity mutual fund performance evaluation using extended TOPSIS method with different distance approaches. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 4642–4649.

Chamodrakas, I., Alexopoulou, N., & Martakos, D. (2009). Customer evaluation for order acceptance using a novel class of fuzzy methods based on TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7409–7415.

Danaei, A., & Haghighi, M. (2013). Measuring the relative performance of stock market using TOPSIS. Management Science Letters, 3(1), 91-96.

De Koster, M. B. M., Balk, B. M., & Van Nus, W. T. I. (2009). On using DEA for benchmarking container terminals. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(11), 1140-1155.

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Rao, R. V., & Davim, J. P. (2008). A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35(7-8), 751-760.

Orougi, S., Maghari, A., Mohammadi, H., Mohammadi, A & Irani, M. (2012). An empirical investigation to use solar–geothermal hybrid energy system for small towns. Management Science Letters , 2(7), 2287-2292.

Rickards, R. C. (2003). Setting benchmarks and evaluating balanced scorecards with data envelopment analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(3), 226-245.

Rostampour, S. (2012). An application of TOPSIS for ranking internet web browsers. Decision Science Letters, 1(2), 53-58.

Saaty, T. L. (1992). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9–26.

Sengupta, J. K. (2005). Nonparametric efficiency analysis under uncertainty using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 95(1), 39-49.

Taner, M. T., & Sezen, B. (2009). An assessment of diagnostic efficiency by Taguchi/DEA methods. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance,22(1), 93-98.

Wang, Y. J. (2008). Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1837-1845.

Wong, W. P., & Wong, K. Y. (2007). Supply chain performance measurement system using DEA modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(3), 361-381.

Wu, D. D., & Ho, C. T. B. (2007). Productivity and efficiency analysis of Taiwan & apos; s integrated circuit industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(8), 715-730.

Yoon, K. P., & Hwang, C. L. (1995). Multiple attribute decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
  • 17
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Decision Science Letters | Year: 2013 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 4 | Views: 2738 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • A cause and effect two-stage BSC-DEA method for measuring the relative effi ...
  • An application of TOPSIS for ranking internet web browsers
  • Measuring the relative performance of stock market using TOPSIS
  • A hybrid TOPSIS-BSC method for strategic planning
  • An application of multiple criteria decision-making techniques for ranking ...

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2025 GrowingScience.Com