Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Current Chemistry Letters » A review of mathematical methods in energy management optimization

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (96)
  • HE (32)
  • SCI (26)

CCL Volumes

    • Volume 1 (23)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 2 (26)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 3 (30)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (10)
      • Issue 3 (8)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 4 (21)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (6)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 5 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 6 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 7 (15)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (3)
    • Volume 8 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 9 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 10 (43)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (7)
      • Issue 3 (17)
      • Issue 4 (14)
    • Volume 11 (43)
      • Issue 1 (14)
      • Issue 2 (11)
      • Issue 3 (10)
      • Issue 4 (8)
    • Volume 12 (78)
      • Issue 1 (21)
      • Issue 2 (22)
      • Issue 3 (20)
      • Issue 4 (15)
    • Volume 13 (68)
      • Issue 1 (23)
      • Issue 2 (17)
      • Issue 3 (16)
      • Issue 4 (12)
    • Volume 14 (68)
      • Issue 1 (20)
      • Issue 2 (13)
      • Issue 3 (22)
      • Issue 4 (13)
    • Volume 15 (13)
      • Issue 1 (13)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(111)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Trust(83)
TOPSIS(83)
Financial performance(83)
Sustainability(82)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Artificial intelligence(77)
Knowledge Management(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(63)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2184)
Indonesia(1290)
India(788)
Jordan(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(453)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(111)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Current Chemistry Letters

ISSN 1927-730x (Online) - ISSN 1927-7296 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 14 Issue 1 pp. 1-10 , 2025

A review of mathematical methods in energy management optimization Pages 1-10 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Zahra Fatemi, Seyed Jafar Sadjadi, Ahmad Makui

DOI: 10.5267/j.ccl.2024.11.007

Keywords: Energy management, Mathematical methodology, Geometric programming

Abstract: Annual increases in power use need improved energy management. Several universities and research organizations have focused on pursuing energy efficiency and renewable energy to satisfy this stipulation. This study provides a thorough and organized systematic review of over 2000 operational research studies conducted between 2019 and 2023. In summary, this study explores potential innovations to enhance existing literature utilizing mathematical tools in energy management. Our systematic literature review indicates that geometric planning is a novel mathematical technique in energy management. Based on the specific problems, this paper discusses geometric planning and proposes its integration with other mathematical techniques.

How to cite this paper
Fatemi, Z., Sadjadi, S & Makui, A. (2025). A review of mathematical methods in energy management optimization.Current Chemistry Letters, 14(1), 1-10.

Refrences
1. Dominguez, R., Cannella, S., & Framinan, J. M. (2021). Remanufacturing configuration in complex supply chains. Omega, 101, 102268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102268.
2. Huang, W., & Zhu, H. (2021). Performance evaluation and improvement for ZEV credit regulation in a competitive environment. Omega, 102, 102294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102294.
3. Napp, T. A., Gambhir, A., Hills, T. P., Florin, N., & Fennell, P. S. (2014). A review of the technologies, economics, and policy instruments for decarbonising energy-intensive manufacturing industries. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev, 30, 616-640.
4. Zhang, Q., Tang, W., & Zhang, J. (2018). Who should determine energy efficiency level in a green cost-sharing supply chain with learning effect?. Comput. Ind. Eng., 115, 226-239.
5. Safarzadeh, S., & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2020). A duopolistic game for designing a comprehensive energy-efficiency scheme regarding consumer features: Which energy policy is the best? J. Clean. Prod., 255, 120195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120195.
6. Safarzadeh, S., Rasti-Barzoki, M., & Hejazi, S. R. (2020). A review of optimal energy policy instruments on industrial energy efficiency programs, rebound effects, and government policies. Energ. Pol., 139, 111342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111342.
7. Safarzadeh, S., Rasti-Barzoki, M., Hejazi, S. R., & Piran, M. J. (2020). A game-theoretic approach for the duopoly pricing of energy-efficient appliances regarding innovation protection and social welfare. Energy, 200, 117517, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117517.
8. Liu, K., Li, W., Jia, F., & Lan, Y. (2022). Optimal strategies of green product supply chains based on behavior-based pricing. J. Clean. Prod., 130288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130288.
9. Nielsen, I. E., Majumder, S., Sana, S. S., & Saha, S. (2019). Comparative analysis of government incentives and game structures on single and two-period green supply chain. J. Clean. Prod., 235, 1371-1398.
10. Mahmoudi, R., & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2018). Sustainable supply chains under government intervention with a real-world case study: An evolutionary game-theoretic approach. Comput. Ind. Eng., 116, 130-143.
11. Huang, W., Zhou, W., Chen, J., & Chen, X. (2019). The government’s optimal subsidy scheme under Manufacturers’ competition of price and product energy efficiency. Omega, 84, 70-101.
12. Bilgen, S., Keleş, S., Kaygusuz, A., Sarı, A., & Kaygusuz, K. (2008). Global warming and renewable energy sources for sustainable development: a case study in Turkey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 12(2), 372-396.
13. Zhang, X., Pei, W., Deng, W., Du, Y., Qi, Z., & Dong, Z. (2015). Emerging smart grid technology for mitigating global warming. Int. J. Energy Res., 39(13), 1742-1756.
14. Kirchhoff, H., Kebir, N., Neumann, K., Heller, P. W., & Strunz, K. (2016). Developing mutual success factors and their application to swarm electrification: microgrids with 100% renewable energies in the Global South and Germany. J. Clean. Prod., 128, 190-200.
15. Papageorgiou, A., Ashok, A., Farzad, T. H., & Sundberg, C. (2020). Climate change impact of integrating a solar microgrid system into the Swedish electricity grid. Appl. Energy, 268, 114981, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114981.
16. Yoldaş, Y., Önen, A., Muyeen, S. M., Vasilakos, A. V., & Alan, I. (2017). Enhancing smart grid with microgrids: Challenges and opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 72, 205-214.
17. Zhang, M., Jiao, Z., Ran, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Optimal energy and reserve scheduling in a renewable-dominant power system. Omega, 118, 102848, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2023.102848.
18. Wang, G., Zhang, Q., Li, H., McLellan, B. C., Chen, S., Li, Y., & Tian, Y. (2017). Study on the promotion impact of demand response on distributed PV penetration by using non-cooperative game theoretical analysis. Appl. Energy, 185, 1869-1878.
19. Tushar, M. H. K., Zeineddine, A. W., & Assi, C. (2017). Demand-side management by regulating charging and discharging of the EV, ESS, and utilizing renewable energy. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 14(1), 117-126.
20. Van Ackooij, W., De Boeck, J., Detienne, B., Pan, S., & Poss, M. (2018). Optimizing power generation in the presence of micro-grids. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 271(2), 450-461.
21. Fang, Y., Wei, W., Liu, F., Mei, S., Chen, L., & Li, J. (2019). Improving solar power usage with electric vehicles: Analyzing a public-private partnership cooperation scheme based on evolutionary game theory. J. Clean. Prod., 233, 1284-1297.
22. Akbari-Dibavar, A., Nojavan, S., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B., & Zare, K. (2020). Smart home energy management using hybrid robust-stochastic optimization. Comput. Ind. Eng., 143, 106425, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106425.
23. Dai, Y., Qi, Y., Li, L., Wang, B., & Gao, H. (2021). A dynamic pricing scheme for electric vehicle in photovoltaic charging station based on Stackelberg game considering user satisfaction. Comput. Ind. Eng., 154, 107117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107117.
24. Lin, Q., Liu, L. J., Yuan, M., Ge, L. J., Wang, Y. H., & Zhang, M. (2021). Choice of the distributed photovoltaic power generation operating mode for a manufacturing enterprise: Surrounding users vs a power grid. J. Clean. Prod., 293, 126199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126199.
25. Erol, Ö., & Filik, Ü. B. (2022). A Stackelberg game approach for energy sharing management of a microgrid providing flexibility to entities. Appl. Energy, 316, 118944, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118944.
26. Luo, X., Shi, W., Jiang, Y., Liu, Y., & Xia, J. (2022). Distributed peer-to-peer energy trading based on game theory in a community microgrid considering ownership complexity of distributed energy resources. J. Clean. Prod., 351, 131573, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131573.
27. Zhou, W., & Huang, W. (2016). Contract designs for energy-saving product development in a monopoly. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 250(3), 902-913.
28. Zhou, W., Huang, W., & Zhou, S. X. (2017). Energy performance contracting in a competitive environment. Decis. Sci. J., 48(4), 723-765.
29. Safarzadeh, S., & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2019). A game-theoretic approach for pricing policies in a duopolistic supply chain considering energy productivity, industrial rebound effect, and government policies. Energy, 167, 92-105.
30. Safarzadeh, S., & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2019). A game-theoretic approach for assessing residential energy-efficiency program considering rebound, consumer behavior, and government policies. Appl. Energ., 233, 44-61.
31. uit het Broek, M. A., Van der Heide, G., & Van Foreest, N. D. (2020). Energy-saving policies for temperature-controlled production systems with state-dependent setup times and costs. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 287(3), 916-928.
32. Rasti-Barzoki, M., & Moon, I. (2020). A game-theoretic approach for car pricing and its energy efficiency level versus governmental sustainability goals by considering rebound effect: A case study of South Korea. Appl. Energ., 271, 115196.
33. Yan, J., Deng, D., Lu, F., & Zhang, Z. (2020). A new efficient energy-preserving finite volume element scheme for the improved Boussinesq equation. Appl. Math. Model., 87, 20-41.
34. Wang, W., Du, W., Cheng, C., Lu, X., & Zou, W. (2022). Output feedback control for energy-saving asymmetric hydraulic servo system based on desired compensation approach. Appl. Math. Model., 101, 360-379.
35. Chargui, K., Zouadi, T., Sreedharan, V. R., El Fallahi, A., & Reghioui, M. (2023). A novel robust exact decomposition algorithm for berth and quay crane allocation and scheduling problems considering uncertainty and energy efficiency. Omega, 118, 102868, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2023.102868.
36. Bai, Q., Chen, J., & Xu, J. (2023). Energy conservation investment and supply chain structure under cap-and-trade regulation for a green product. Omega, 119, 102886, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2023.102886.
37. Fatemi, Z., Sadjadi, S. J., Jabbarzadeh, A., & Makui, A. (2023). Investments in energy efficiency with government environmental sensitiveness: An application of geometric programming and game theory. Sci. Iran., 10.24200/sci.2023.60289.6706.
38. Diaby, M., Cruz, J. M., & Nsakanda, A. L. (2013). Shortening cycle times in multi-product, capacitated production environments through quality level improvements and setup reduction. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 228(3), 526-535.
39. Duffin, R. J., & Peterson, E. L. (1973). Geometric programming with signomials. J. Optim. Theor. Appl., 11(1), 3-35.
40. Shen, P., Zhu, Z., & Chen, X. (2019). A practicable contraction approach for the sum of the generalized polynomial ratios problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 278(1), 36-48.
41. Sadjadi, S. J., Oroujee, M., & Aryanezhad, M. B. (2005). Optimal production and marketing planning. Comput. Optim. Appl ., 30, 195-203.
42. Sadjadi, S. J., Ghazanfari, M., & Yousefli, A. (2010). Fuzzy pricing and marketing planning model: A possibilistic geometric programming approach. Expert Syst. Appl., 37(4), 3392-3397.
43. Sadjadi, S. J., Yazdian, S. A., & Shahanaghi, K. (2012). Optimal pricing, lot-sizing and marketing planning in a capacitated and imperfect production system. Comput. Ind. Eng., 62(1), 349-358.
44. Lim, S. (2013). A joint optimal pricing and order quantity model under parameter uncertainty and its practical implementation. Omega, 41(6), 998-1007.
45. Ruby, R., Zhong, S., Ng, D. W. K., Wu, K., & Leung, V. C. (2019). Enhanced energy-efficient downlink resource allocation in green non-orthogonal multiple access systems. Comput. Commun., 139, 78-90.
46. Yaghin, R. G. (2020). Enhancing supply chain production-marketing planning with geometric multivariate demand function (a case study of textile industry). Comput. Ind. Eng., 140, 106220.
47. Hayhoe, M., Barreras, F., & Preciado, V. M. (2021). Multitask learning and nonlinear optimal control of the COVID-19 outbreak: A geometric programming approach. Annu. Rev. Control., 52, 495-507.
48. Liu, Z., Zhu, H., Yuan, Y., Chan, K. Y., Yang, Y., & Guan, X. (2022). Maximizing lower bound of energy efficiency in multi-tier heterogeneous cellular network via stochastic geometry. Comput. Commun., 184, 64-72.
49. Boyd, S., Kim, S. J., Vandenberghe, L., & Hassibi, A. (2007). A tutorial on geometric programming. Optim. Eng., 8(1), 67-127.
50. Islam, S. (2008). Multi-objective marketing planning inventory model: a geometric programming approach. Appl. Math. Comput., 205(1), 238-246.
51. Liu, S. T. (2009). Using geometric programming to profit maximization with interval coefficients and quantity discount. Appl. Math. Comput, 209(2), 259-265.
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Current Chemistry Letters | Year: 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Views: 527 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • A study on the competition and cooperation relationship of China's photovo ...
  • The optimal design of differentiated subsidy policies for new energy vehicl ...
  • Collaborative decision making of photovoltaic industry chain considering ca ...
  • Contract selection for collaborative innovation in the new energy vehicle s ...
  • Integrated modeling of the peer-to-peer markets in the energy industry

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com