Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Authors » R. Venkata Rao

Journals

  • IJIEC (726)
  • MSL (2637)
  • DSL (649)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (404)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (247)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (26)
  • SCI (26)

Keywords

Supply chain management(163)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(148)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(108)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
Competitive advantage(93)
SMEs(86)
optimization(84)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(81)
TOPSIS(80)
Job satisfaction(79)
Sustainability(79)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Genetic Algorithm(76)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(60)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sautma Ronni Basana(27)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2177)
Indonesia(1278)
Jordan(784)
India(782)
Vietnam(500)
Saudi Arabia(440)
Malaysia(438)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(182)
Thailand(151)
United States(110)
Turkey(103)
Ukraine(102)
Egypt(97)
Canada(92)
Pakistan(84)
Peru(83)
Morocco(79)
United Kingdom(79)
Nigeria(77)


» Show all countries
Sort articles by: Volume | Date | Most Rates | Most Views | Reviews | Alphabet
1.

Jaya: A simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems Pages 19-34 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: R. Venkata Rao

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2015.8.004

Keywords: CEC 2006, Constrained benchmark problems, Jaya algorithm, Optimization, Statistical tests, Unconstrained benchmark problems

Abstract:
A simple yet powerful optimization algorithm is proposed in this paper for solving the constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. This algorithm is based on the concept that the solution obtained for a given problem should move towards the best solution and should avoid the worst solution. This algorithm requires only the common control parameters and does not require any algorithm-specific control parameters. The performance of the proposed algorithm is investigated by implementing it on 24 constrained benchmark functions having different characteristics given in Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2006) and the performance is compared with that of other well-known optimization algorithms. The results have proved the better effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. Furthermore, the statistical analysis of the experimental work has been carried out by conducting the Friedman’s rank test and Holm-Sidak test. The proposed algorithm is found to secure first rank for the ‘best’ and ‘mean’ solutions in the Friedman’s rank test for all the 24 constrained benchmark problems. In addition to solving the constrained benchmark problems, the algorithm is also investigated on 30 unconstrained benchmark problems taken from the literature and the performance of the algorithm is found better.
Details
  • 68
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: IJIEC | Year: 2016 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1 | Views: 15346 | Reviews: 0

 
2.

Review of applications of TLBO algorithm and a tutorial for beginners to solve the unconstrained and constrained optimization problems Pages 1-30 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: R. Venkata Rao

DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2015.9.003

Keywords: Constrained and unconstrained problems, Optimization, TLBO algorithm, Tutorial

Abstract:
The teaching-learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithm is finding a large number of applications in different fields of engineering and science since its introduction in 2011. The major applications are found in electrical engineering, mechanical design, thermal engineering, manufacturing engineering, civil engineering, structural engineering, computer engineering, electronics engineering, physics, chemistry, biotechnology and economics. This paper presents a review of applications of TLBO algorithm and a tutorial for solving the unconstrained and constrained optimization problems. The tutorial is expected to be useful to the beginners.
Details
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: DSL | Year: 2016 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 1 | Views: 11143 | Reviews: 0

 
3.

A multi-objective improved teaching-learning based optimization algorithm for unconstrained and constrained optimization problems Pages 1-22 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: R. Venkata Rao, Vivek Patel

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.09.007

Keywords: Inverted generational distance, Multi-objective optimization, Teaching-learning based optimization

Abstract:
The present work proposes a multi-objective improved teaching-learning based optimization (MO-ITLBO) algorithm for unconstrained and constrained multi-objective function optimization. The MO-ITLBO algorithm is the improved version of basic teaching-learning based optimization (TLBO) algorithm adapted for multi-objective problems. The basic TLBO algorithm is improved to enhance its exploration and exploitation capacities by introducing the concept of number of teachers, adaptive teaching factor, tutorial training and self-motivated learning. The MO-ITLBO algorithm uses a grid-based approach to adaptively assess the non-dominated solutions (i.e. Pareto front) maintained in an external archive. The performance of the MO-ITLBO algorithm is assessed by implementing it on unconstrained and constrained test problems proposed for the Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2009 (CEC 2009) competition. The performance assessment is done by using the inverted generational distance (IGD) measure. The IGD measures obtained by using the MO-ITLBO algorithm are compared with the IGD measures of the other state-of-the-art algorithms available in the literature. Finally, Lexicographic ordering is used to assess the overall performance of competitive algorithms. Results have shown that the proposed MO-ITLBO algorithm has obtained the 1st rank in the optimization of unconstrained test functions and the 3rd rank in the optimization of constrained test functions.
Details
  • 51
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: IJIEC | Year: 2014 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 1 | Views: 4351 | Reviews: 0

 
4.

Comparative performance of an elitist teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm for solving unconstrained optimization problems Pages 29-50 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: R. Venkata Rao, Vivek Patel

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2012.09.001

Keywords: Number of generations, Population size, Elitism, Teaching-learning-based optimization, Unconstrained optimization problems

Abstract:
Teaching-Learning-based optimization (TLBO) is a recently proposed population based algorithm, which simulates the teaching-learning process of the class room. This algorithm requires only the common control parameters and does not require any algorithm-specific control parameters. In this paper, the effect of elitism on the performance of the TLBO algorithm is investigated while solving unconstrained benchmark problems. The effects of common control parameters such as the population size and the number of generations on the performance of the algorithm are also investigated. The proposed algorithm is tested on 76 unconstrained benchmark functions with different characteristics and the performance of the algorithm is compared with that of other well known optimization algorithms. A statistical test is also performed to investigate the results obtained using different algorithms. The results have proved the effectiveness of the proposed elitist TLBO algorithm.
Details
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: IJIEC | Year: 2013 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 | Views: 4254 | Reviews: 0

 
5.

An elitist teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm for solving complex constrained optimization problems Pages 535-560 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: R. Venkata Rao, Vivek Patel

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2012.03.007

Keywords: Elitism, Population size, Teaching-learning-based optimization

Abstract:
Nature inspired population based algorithms is a research field which simulates different natural phenomena to solve a wide range of problems. Researchers have proposed several algorithms considering different natural phenomena. Teaching-Learning-based optimization (TLBO) is one of the recently proposed population based algorithm which simulates the teaching-learning process of the class room. This algorithm does not require any algorithm-specific control parameters. In this paper, elitism concept is introduced in the TLBO algorithm and its effect on the performance of the algorithm is investigated. The effects of common controlling parameters such as the population size and the number of generations on the performance of the algorithm are also investigated. The proposed algorithm is tested on 35 constrained benchmark functions with different characteristics and the performance of the algorithm is compared with that of other well known optimization algorithms. The proposed algorithm can be applied to various optimization problems of the industrial environment.
Details
  • 68
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: IJIEC | Year: 2012 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 4 | Views: 21539 | Reviews: 0

 
6.

Weighted Euclidean distance based approach as a multiple attribute decision making method for plant or facility layout design selection Pages 365-382 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: R. Venkata Rao

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2012.01.003

Keywords: Multiple attribute decision making, Plant layout design, Weighted Euclidean distance based approach

Abstract:
In response to increasing inflexible customer demands and to improve the competitive advantage, industrial organizations have to adopt strategies to achieve cost reduction, continual quality improvement, increased customer service and on-time delivery performance. Selection of the most suitable plant or facility layout design for an organization is one among the most important strategic issues to fulfill all these above-mentioned objectives. Nowadays, many industrial organizations have come to realize the importance of proper selection of the plant or facility layout design to survive in the global competitive market. Selecting the proper layout design from a given set of candidate alternatives is a difficult task, as many potential qualitative and quantitative criteria need to be considered. This paper proposes a Euclidean distance based approach (WEDBA) as a multiple attribute decision making method to deal with the complex plant or facility layout design problems of the industrial environment. Three examples are included to illustrate the approach.
Details
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: IJIEC | Year: 2012 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 3 | Views: 4643 | Reviews: 0

 
7.

A hybrid multiple attribute decision making method for solving problems of industrial environment Pages 631-644 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Dinesh Singh, R. Venkata Rao

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2011.02.001

Keywords: Analytical hierarchy process, Electroplating system selection, Graph theory and matrix approach, Multiple attribute decision making

Abstract:
The selection of appropriate alternative in the industrial environment is an important but, at the same time, a complex and difficult problem because of the availability of a wide range of alternatives and similarity among them. Therefore, there is a need for simple, systematic, and logical methods or mathematical tools to guide decision makers in considering a number of selection attributes and their interrelations. In this paper, a hybrid decision making method of graph theory and matrix approach (GTMA) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is proposed. Three examples are presented to illustrate the potential of the proposed GTMA-AHP method and the results are compared with the results obtained using other decision making methods.
Details
  • 34
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: IJIEC | Year: 2011 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 3 | Views: 3024 | Reviews: 0

 

® 2010-2025 GrowingScience.Com