Processing, Please wait...

  • Publisher Home
  • Home
  • 🔙 Back
  • 📚 Journals
    • ⚙️ IJIEC - Industrial Engineering Computations
    • 🌐 IJDNS - Data and Network Science
    • 🧪 CCL - Current Chemistry Letters
    • 💹 AC - Accounting
    • 🎯 DSL - Decision Science Letters
    • 🚛 USCM - Uncertain Supply Chain Management
    • 🏗️ JPM - Journal of Project Management
    • 🏥 HE - Healthcare Engineering
    • 📈 SCI - Scientometrica
    • 🔩 ESM - Engineering Solid Mechanics
    • 🌿 JFS - Journal of Future Sustainability
    • 💼 MSL - Management Science Letters
  • 📝 Submit Article
  • 📊 Statistics
  • 📋 About
    • 📄 About Us
    • 📰 Blog
    • 📢 News
    • 📧 Contact
  • 📺 Tutorial
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Authors » H.A. Soretire

⭐ Highly Cited Articles

  • Jaya Algorithm
  • Rao Algorithm
  • TLBO Algorithm
  • ChatGPT and Blended Learning

Journals

  • IJIEC (804)
  • IJDS (992)
  • DSL (722)
  • ESM (434)
  • CCL (544)
  • JPM (323)
  • AC (567)
  • JFS (101)
  • MSL (2653)
  • USCM (1104)
  • HE (49)
  • SCI (50)

🔑 Keywords

Supply chain management(168)
Jordan(167)
Vietnam(154)
Customer satisfaction(124)
Performance(116)
Supply chain(113)
Artificial intelligence(99)
Competitive advantage(98)
Service quality(98)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(92)
Sustainability(91)
optimization(88)
TOPSIS(85)
Financial performance(84)
Trust(84)
Job satisfaction(81)
Knowledge Management(80)
Genetic Algorithm(80)
Social media(79)


» Show all keywords

✍️ Authors

Naser Azad(83)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(67)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(40)
Dmaithan Almajali(38)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Ahmad Makui(33)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Sautma Ronni Basana(31)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)


» Show all authors

🌍 Countries

1. Algeria (52)
2. Angola (2)
3. Argentina (22)
4. Armenia (2)
5. Australia (52)
6. Austria (2)
7. Bahrain (26)
8. Bangladesh (58)
9. Belarus (4)
10. Belgium (3)
11. Benin (2)
12. Benin Republic (1)
13. Bhutan (1)
14. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1)
15. Botswana (8)
16. Brazil (40)
17. Brunei (1)
18. Bulgaria (1)
19. Burkina Faso (1)
20. Cameroon (1)
Total: 121 countries

Show all countries
Sort articles by: 📖 Volume | 📅 Date | ⭐ Most Rates | 👁️ Most Views | 🚀 Rising Stars | 🔗 Citations (Scopus) | 🔥 Hot Papers
1.

Shear capacity estimation of reinforced concrete deep beams using machine learning techniques Pages 53-66 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: A.I. Quadri, H.A. Soretire, H.I. Babalola, W.K. Kupolati, C. Ackerman, J. Snyman, J.M. Ndambuk

doi 10.5267/j.esm.2025.11.001

🔑 Keywords: Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams, Shear Capacity, Machine Learning, kNN, M5Rules, Random Forest, SMOReg

Abstract:
Conventionally, the deep beam shear strength is analyzed with codes (mechanics and empirical models). The purpose of this investigation is to provide an alternative way of accurately estimating the shear capacity of Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams (RCDBs), including those with and without shear reinforcements (WOR and WWR), by adopting machine learning models. Four machine learning algorithms: k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Random Forest, M5Rules, and Sequential Minimal Optimization for Regression (SMOReg), were considered, and the selection was based on their performance in previous related studies. A database of 733 samples for WWR and 378 samples for WOR was compiled, utilizing 14 and 8 input features, respectively, in each case. WEKA, an open-source software suite, was used in preprocessing the data and also tuning the hyperparameters. SMOReg beat other models for WOR with an R² value of 0.9607, while Random Forest did best for WWR with an R² value of 0.9667 in the testing sets. The shear strengths predicted by the machine learning models were compared to four traditional standard codes. The results show that the machine learning models beat conventional methods by a large margin, while also being consistent with earlier models generated using machine learning. This demonstrates the model's prediction accuracy and robustness.
Details
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: ESM | Year: 2026 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Views: 608

 

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com