The paper presents a fresh empirical approach for clarifying the impact of Jordan's most prevalent forms of ownership on the link between the “fair value (FV)” model share of assets and auditing costs. Using information gathered from 105 Jordanian financial listed companies spanning 2005 to 2018, ordinary least squares regression is applied in this paper. While financial institution ownership variables cause the opposite to be observed, family ownership decreases the link among the share of assets at FV and audit expenses. Family ownership results in decreased auditing costs paid only for “Level 1” assets; conversely, the extremely uncertain FV assets “Level 2 & 3” show the opposite. Financial institutional ownership demonstrates that auditing FV Level 1 leads to higher auditing costs. When relating FV Levels 2 and 3, the moderating effect of financial institutional ownership was significantly negative. No significant moderating effect of government ownership is confirmed. The inconclusive and limited empirical explanation of audit costs resulting from the FV model from a Western setting motivates our investigation. This study is considered as a unique study as it takes into account the most prevalent types of ownership in the Jordanian context in the FV studies reviewing auditees in Jordan. New evidence is generated by documenting audit characteristics of Jordan, a developing country, and its institutional environment and compliance with the FV model. The results are useful to regulators and policymakers in regulating the auditing profession and resolving FV audit-related conflicts and issues.

The study aimed to evaluate how cloud technology implementation would affect Jordanian industrial businesses' financial statements' integrity across a range of variables (financial condition, income, cash flow, owners' equity). The investigation involved employees from financial and internal audit departments, including various job titles. A random sample of 150 questionnaires was distributed among the study population, with a 96% response rate (145 retrieved). Respondents were scored using a Likert five-point scale on the 44-paragraph questionnaire. To accomplish its goals, the study used a descriptive-analytical methodology and statistical techniques such as path analysis (using AMOS) and simple linear regression analysis (using SPSS). According to the study, the implementation of cloud accounting has a statistically significant effect on the quality of financial statements by Dimension (statement of financial position, income statement, statement of cash flows, and list of equity), according to the study. Applying cloud accounting has a statistically significant effect on the internal control system, and the internal control system has a statistically significant impact on the accuracy of financial statements. Furthermore, cloud accounting has a statistically significant impact on the quality of financial statements in Jordanian industrial companies through the internal control system as an intermediate variable. The study made several recommendations in light of the earlier findings, the most significant of which are: determining the internal control system's current state both before and after cloud accounting was implemented; creating and executing a robust internal control system compliant with international accounting standards; and assessing the suitability of cloud accounting solutions through thorough evaluations. The report also emphasized how crucial it is to set up ongoing audit and internal control systems to evaluate how well the internal control and cloud accounting systems are working together.