Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Authors » Daria Podgayskaya

Journals

  • IJIEC (747)
  • MSL (2643)
  • DSL (668)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (26)
  • SCI (26)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(110)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(86)
Trust(83)
Financial performance(83)
Sustainability(81)
TOPSIS(81)
Job satisfaction(80)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Genetic Algorithm(77)
Knowledge Management(77)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(62)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Sautma Ronni Basana(29)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2181)
Indonesia(1289)
Jordan(786)
India(786)
Vietnam(504)
Saudi Arabia(452)
Malaysia(441)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(206)
Thailand(153)
United States(110)
Turkey(106)
Ukraine(104)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Peru(88)
Pakistan(85)
United Kingdom(80)
Morocco(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries
Sort articles by: Volume | Date | Most Rates | Most Views | Reviews | Alphabet
1.

Modeling of hoop stress in defect-free steel pipe subjected to internal pressure and temperature difference using finite element analysis and response surface methodology Pages 81-102 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Sergei Sherbakov, Daria Podgayskaya, Arina Skolubovich, Pawan Kumar, Pavel Poliakov, Vasilii Dobrianskii

DOI: 10.5267/j.esm.2025.10.003

Keywords: Structural steel pipe, Hoop stress, Finite element analysis, Response surface methodology, Mathematical modeling

Abstract:
In the present work, modeling of hoop stress in the defect-free structural steel pipe was done under the combined effect of internal hydrostatic pressure and temperature difference using finite element analysis (FEA) and response surface methodology (RSM). The FEA simulation was done on the quarter-ellipsoidal sections of the structural steel pipe specimen using ANSYS 2022 R1 software. The calculated hoop stress using FEA was in agreement with the analytical solution of hoop stress. The thermodynamically induced hoop stress due to the temperature difference (without internal hydrostatic pressure) exhibited a compressive state at the inner wall and a tensile state at the outer wall of the specimen. This compression-tension state also provided a thermodynamic situation at which the total hoop stress becomes null at the neutral axis. However, when the specimen was subjected to internal hydrostatic pressure (in addition to the temperature difference), the initial neutral axis received a thermomechanical hoop stress of a tensile nature. A drop in the burst pressure from 11.5 MPa to 9.9 MPa was observed when the steel pipe was subjected to a maximum temperature difference of 40 °C. A new analytical equation for thermomechanical hoop stress was developed using RSM modeling by considering independent variables as the normalized position in the wall (ṝ), internal hydrostatic pressure (P), and temperature difference (ΔT). The developed analytical equation envisages that the interacting effect of independent variables ṝ(ΔT) was maximum, followed by the interacting effect of ṝ(P). An optimum internal hydrostatic pressure of 7.43 MPa was calculated considering the flow stress of the material for all possible combinations of the other two independent variables (ṝ and ΔT). Furthermore, at the optimum ΔT of 39.65 °C, the interacting effect of the ṝ(P) provided contour-curvature plots, both below the yield strength and endurance limit, considering different combinations of normalized position in the wall and internal hydrostatic pressure.
Details
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: ESM | Year: 2026 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Views: 62 | Reviews: 0

 
2.

Prediction of threshold von-mises stress distribution of the sections of oil pipeline steel with internal corrosion defects using finite element analysis Pages 299-316 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Sergei Sherbakov, Daria Podgayskaya, Pawan Kumar, Pavel Poliakov, Vasilii Dobrianskii

DOI: 10.5267/j.esm.2025.2.001

Keywords: Structural steel pipe, Von-Mises stress, Finite element analysis, Stress intensity, Failure pressure

Abstract:
The current work presents a finite element analysis (FEA) based investigation of the structural steel pipe with internal corrosion defects. A total of 27 different geometrical conditions for internal corrosion defect were considered using 3 different internal pressures of 2.2 MPa, 4.5 MPa, and 6 MPa. The validation of the FEA model was carried out using the analytical solution for failure pressure using radial and hoop stresses. The failure pressure of the uncorroded pipe was 11.5 MPa. In contrast, for pipe with internal corrosion defect having the largest defect depth (1.7 mm), largest length (454 mm), and sharpest geometry (width of 26 mm), the failure pressure from FEA was 6 MPa. The remaining strength at this boundary condition was 0.521. The radial stress influences the strain in wall thickness which was 8.8 mm and much less as compared to other dimensions of pipeline which diminishes the material's ability to resist the failure pressure. The Von-Mises stress accumulation inside the interface increases the stress intensity (K) distribution at the vicinity of the internal corrosion defect geometry vis-à-vis lowers the K-distribution just outside of the internal corrosion defect. The largest factor of safety (FOS) of 2.11 was obtained at threshold boundary conditions considering fatigue limit as the optimum stress. It is then suggested that the FOS for the "break-before-leak" leak model can be anywhere between 2.11 to 1.45 and hence the pipeline cannot burst into rapture.
Details
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: ESM | Year: 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Views: 217 | Reviews: 0

 

® 2010-2026 GrowingScience.Com