Processing, Please wait...

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Search:
  • Advanced Search

Growing Science » Accounting » A systematic review of COTS evaluation and selection approaches

Journals

  • IJIEC (726)
  • MSL (2637)
  • DSL (649)
  • CCL (508)
  • USCM (1092)
  • ESM (413)
  • AC (562)
  • JPM (271)
  • IJDS (912)
  • JFS (91)
  • HE (26)
  • SCI (26)

AC Volumes

    • Volume 1 (9)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (4)
    • Volume 2 (21)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 3 (22)
      • Issue 1 (7)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 4 (17)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (4)
    • Volume 5 (17)
      • Issue 1 (4)
      • Issue 2 (4)
      • Issue 3 (4)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 6 (154)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (16)
      • Issue 3 (18)
      • Issue 4 (25)
      • Issue 5 (30)
      • Issue 6 (30)
      • Issue 7 (30)
    • Volume 7 (205)
      • Issue 1 (29)
      • Issue 2 (27)
      • Issue 3 (25)
      • Issue 4 (30)
      • Issue 5 (26)
      • Issue 6 (32)
      • Issue 7 (36)
    • Volume 8 (46)
      • Issue 1 (10)
      • Issue 2 (15)
      • Issue 3 (14)
      • Issue 4 (7)
    • Volume 9 (21)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (6)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 10 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 11 (20)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)
      • Issue 3 (5)
      • Issue 4 (5)
    • Volume 12 (10)
      • Issue 1 (5)
      • Issue 2 (5)

Keywords

Supply chain management(166)
Jordan(161)
Vietnam(149)
Customer satisfaction(120)
Performance(113)
Supply chain(108)
Service quality(98)
Competitive advantage(95)
Tehran Stock Exchange(94)
SMEs(87)
optimization(85)
Financial performance(83)
Trust(81)
TOPSIS(80)
Job satisfaction(80)
Sustainability(79)
Factor analysis(78)
Social media(78)
Knowledge Management(77)
Artificial intelligence(76)


» Show all keywords

Authors

Naser Azad(82)
Mohammad Reza Iravani(64)
Zeplin Jiwa Husada Tarigan(61)
Endri Endri(45)
Muhammad Alshurideh(42)
Hotlan Siagian(39)
Jumadil Saputra(36)
Dmaithan Almajali(36)
Muhammad Turki Alshurideh(35)
Barween Al Kurdi(32)
Ahmad Makui(32)
Basrowi Basrowi(31)
Hassan Ghodrati(31)
Mohammad Khodaei Valahzaghard(30)
Shankar Chakraborty(29)
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa(29)
Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-Hawary(28)
Sautma Ronni Basana(28)
Prasadja Ricardianto(28)
Haitham M. Alzoubi(27)


» Show all authors

Countries

Iran(2179)
Indonesia(1285)
Jordan(786)
India(785)
Vietnam(502)
Saudi Arabia(448)
Malaysia(439)
United Arab Emirates(220)
China(184)
Thailand(151)
United States(110)
Ukraine(104)
Turkey(103)
Egypt(98)
Canada(92)
Pakistan(85)
Peru(85)
Morocco(79)
United Kingdom(79)
Nigeria(78)


» Show all countries

Accounting

ISSN 2369-7407 (Online) - ISSN 2369-7393 (Print)
Quarterly Publication
Volume 3 Issue 4 pp. 227-236 , 2017

A systematic review of COTS evaluation and selection approaches Pages 227-236 Right click to download the paper Download PDF

Authors: Rakesh Garg

DOI: 10.5267/j.ac.2017.1.003

Keywords: Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS), CBSE

Abstract: In the past decades, a number of researchers have made their significant contributions to develop different approaches for solving a very challenging problem of commercial off-the shelf (COTS) selection. The development of software with high quality and minimum development time has always been a difficult job for the software developers. Therefore, in today’s scenario, software developers move towards the implementation of component based software engineering that relies on the integration of small pieces of code namely (COTS). In this study, we present a comprehensive descriptive explanation of the various COTS evaluation and selection approaches developed by various researchers in the past to understand the concept of COTS selection. The advantages and disadvantages of each COTS selection approach are also provided, which will give a better prospect to the readers to understand the various existing COTS evaluation and selection approaches.

How to cite this paper
Garg, R. (2017). A systematic review of COTS evaluation and selection approaches.Accounting, 3(4), 227-236.

Refrences
Boehm, B., Port, D., & Yang, Y. (2003, May). WinWin spiral approach to developing COTS-based applications. In EDSER-5 5 th International Workshop on Economic-Driven Software Engineering Research (p. 57).
Burgués, X., Estay, C., Franch, X., Pastor, J. A., & Quer, C. (2002, February). Combined selection of COTS components. In International Conference on COTS-Based Software Systems (pp. 54-64). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Chung, L., & Cooper, K. (2004, May). Matching, ranking, and selecting components: A cots-aware requirements engineering and software architecting approach. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Models and Processes for the Evaluation of COTS Components at 26th International Conference on Software Engineering,(Edinburgh, Scotland, UK (pp. 41-44).
Comella-Dorda, S., Dean, J. C., Morris, E., & Oberndorf, P. (2002, February). A process for COTS software product evaluation. In International Conference on COTS-Based Software Systems (pp. 86-96). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Cortellessa, V., Crnkovic, I., Marinelli, F., & Potena, P. (2008). Experimenting the Automated Selection of COTS Components Based on Cost and System Requirements. J. UCS, 14(8), 1228-1255.
Erol, I., & Ferrell, W. G. (2003). A methodology for selection problems with multiple, conflicting objectives and both qualitative and quantitative criteria. International Journal of Production Economics, 86(3), 187-199.
Grau, G., Carvallo, J. P., Franch, X., & Quer, C. (2004, August). DesCOTS: a software system for selecting COTS components. In Euromicro Conference, 2004. Proceedings. 30th (pp. 118-126). IEEE.
Gregor, S., Hutson, J., & Oresky, C. (2002, February). Storyboard process to assist in requirements verification and adaptation to capabilities inherent in COTS. In International Conference on COTS-Based Software Systems (pp. 132-141). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Gupta, P., Pham, H., Mehlawat, M. K., & Verma, S. (2013). A fuzzy optimization framework for COTS products selection of modular software systems. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 15(2), 91-109.
Gupta, P., Mehlawat, M. K., & Verma, S. (2012). COTS selection using fuzzy interactive approach. Optimization Letters, 6(2), 273-289.
Ibrahim, H., Elamy, A. H. H., Far, B. H., & Eberlein, A. (2011). UnHOS: A Method for Uncertainty Handling in Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Selection. International Journal of Energy, Information & Communications, 2(3).
Kontio, J. (1995). OTSO: a systematic process for reusable software component selection.
Kwong, C. K., Mu, L. F., Tang, J. F., & Luo, X. G. (2010). Optimization of software components selection for component-based software system development. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(4), 618-624.
Kunda, D., & Brooks, L. (1999, April). Applying social-technical approach for COTS selection. In Proceedings of the 4th UKAIS Conference (pp. 552-565).
Lichota, R. W., Vesprini, R. L., & Swanson, B. (1997, June). PRISM Product Examination Process for component based development. In Assessment of Software Tools and Technologies, 1997., Proceedings Fifth International Symposium on (pp. 61-69). IEEE.
Lozano-Tello, A., & Gómez-Pérez, A. (2002, July). BAREMO: how to choose the appropriate software component using the analytic hierarchy process. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering and knowledge engineering (pp. 781-788). ACM.
Maiden, N. A., & Ncube, C. (1998). Acquiring COTS software selection requirements. IEEE software, 15(2), 46-56.
Mohamed, A., Ruhe, G., & Eberlein, A. (2007, February). Decision support for handling mismatches between COTS products and system requirements. In Commercial-off-the-Shelf (COTS)-Based Software Systems, 2007. ICCBSS'07. Sixth International IEEE Conference on (pp. 63-72). IEEE.
Morisio, M., & Tsoukiàs, A. (1997). IusWare: A methodology for the evaluation and selection of software products. IEE Proceedings-Software, 144(3), 162-174.
Phillips, B. C., & Polen, S. M. (2002). Add decision analysis to your COTS selection process. Software Technology Support Center Crosstalk. C. Alves and J. Castro, "CRE: A Systematic Method for COTS Components Selection," in Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, Brazil, 2001.
Shyur, H. J. (2006). COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP. Applied mathematics and computation, 177(1), 251-259.
Ravichandran, K., Suresh, P., & Sekr, K. (2012). ANFIS approach for optimal selection of reusable components. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 24, 5304-5312.
Sarkar, S. (2012). Architecture Centric Tradeoff: A decision support method for COTS selection and life cycle management. in The Seventh International Conference on Software Engineering Advances.
Tran, V., & Liu, D. B. (1997, June). A procurement-centric model for engineering component-based software systems. In Assessment of Software Tools and Technologies, 1997. Proceedings Fifth International Symposium on (pp. 70-79). IEEE.
  • 68
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Journal: Accounting | Year: 2017 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 4 | Views: 2351 | Reviews: 0

Related Articles:
  • MCDM based evaluation and ranking of commercial off-the-shelf using fuzzy b ...
  • A QFD-based decision making model for computer-aided design software select ...
  • Ranking and selection of commercial off-the-shelf using fuzzy distance base ...
  • Application of fuzzy-MOORA method: Ranking of components for reliability es ...
  • Modeling and evaluation of information systems using coloured petri network

Add Reviews

Name:*
E-Mail:
Review:
Bold Italic Underline Strike | Align left Center Align right | Insert smilies Insert link URLInsert protected URL Select color | Add Hidden Text Insert Quote Convert selected text from selection to Cyrillic (Russian) alphabet Insert spoiler
winkwinkedsmileam
belayfeelfellowlaughing
lollovenorecourse
requestsadtonguewassat
cryingwhatbullyangry
Security Code: *
Include security image CAPCHA.
Refresh Code

® 2010-2025 GrowingScience.Com